These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6414630)
1. Letter from ... Chicago. Squeal rules in the nursery. Dunea G Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Oct; 287(6400):1203-4. PubMed ID: 6414630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine: its view of the right to life. Dyck AJ Linacre Q; 1985 May; 52(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 11650751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. U.S. panel calls for patients' right to end life. Schmeck HM N Y Times Web; 1983 Mar; ():A1, C7. PubMed ID: 11647772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Birth-defective infants: a standard for nontreatment decisions. MacMillan ES Stanford Law Rev; 1978 Feb; 30(3):599-633. PubMed ID: 10306127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. 'Baby Doe' thrusts administrators into middle of life-death decision. Punch L; Simler SL Mod Healthc; 1982 Jul; 12(7):72-4. PubMed ID: 10317219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: implications for policy in 1985. Cassel CK Cardozo Law Rev; 1984; 6(2):287-302. PubMed ID: 11651801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Withholding treatment from Baby Doe: from discrimination to child abuse. Rhoden NK; Arras JD Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(1):18-51. PubMed ID: 3158840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Review of report: Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment (President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Washington, D.C., March, 1983). Keyserlingk EW Health Law Can; 1984; 4(4):103-7. PubMed ID: 10310688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legal problems of medical practice; withholding treatment from defective newborns. Taub S Law Med Health Care; 1982 Feb; 10(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 6917002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Treating defective newborns: who decides? On what basis? Boyle JM Hosp Prog; 1982 Aug; 63(8):34-7, 61. PubMed ID: 10256256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An analysis of the HHS notice on treating the handicapped. Connery JR Hosp Prog; 1982 Jul; 63(7):18-20. PubMed ID: 10317218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. 'Baby Doe' rulings-review and comment. Britton JR West J Med; 1984 Feb; 140(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 6730486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Letting defective babies die: who decides? Ellis TS Am J Law Med; 1982; 7(4):393-423. PubMed ID: 7102678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. When is it justifiable not to treat? Weir RF Second Opin; 1986; (2):42-61. PubMed ID: 10281523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical decision-making for defective infants by the Federal government. Taub S Conn Med; 1983 Jul; 47(7):413-6. PubMed ID: 6224633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An attempt to regulate medical decision making. Culliton BJ Clin Res; 1983 Oct; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 10263139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Severe handicap in the newborn: treatment, non-treatment, or assisted death. Lancet; 1979 Dec; 2(8154):1237. PubMed ID: 92638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A cry for help: preventing passive euthanasia decision-making for neonates with non-fatal congenital defects. Beckwith J J Leg Med; 2013; 34(3):273-94. PubMed ID: 24053321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The legal side. "Do not feed...". Cushing M Am J Nurs; 1983 Apr; 83(4):602-4. PubMed ID: 6551143 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]