These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 641579)

  • 1. Comparing the performance of two gamma cameras under high counting rates: principles and practice.
    Guldberg C; Rossing N
    J Nucl Med; 1978 May; 19(5):545-52. PubMed ID: 641579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deadtime characteristics of Anger cameras.
    Sorenson JA
    J Nucl Med; 1975 Apr; 16(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 1113185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility of a high-speed gamma-camera design using the high-yield-pileup-event-recovery method.
    Wong WH; Li H; Uribe J; Baghaei H; Wang Y; Yokoyama S
    J Nucl Med; 2001 Apr; 42(4):624-32. PubMed ID: 11337552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods of correcting Anger camera deadtime losses.
    Sorenson JA
    J Nucl Med; 1976 Feb; 17(02):137-41. PubMed ID: 1245876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image artifacts at high photon fluence rates in single-crystal NaI(T1) scintillation cameras.
    Strand SE; Larsson I
    J Nucl Med; 1978 Apr; 19(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 632930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of window fraction on the deadtime of Anger cameras: concise communication.
    Wicks R; Blau M
    J Nucl Med; 1977 Jul; 18(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 874153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of the distribution of radioactive sources on deadtime loss in a single-crystal gamma camera.
    Inoue Y; Ohtake T; Oritate T; Nishikawa J; Yoshikawa K; Sasaki Y
    Radiat Med; 1998; 16(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 9650906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of count rate parameters in gamma cameras.
    Lewellen TK; Murano R
    J Nucl Med; 1981 Feb; 22(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 7463159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance evaluations of recent wide field scintillation gamma cameras.
    Lim CB; Hoffer PB; Rollo FD; Lilien DL
    J Nucl Med; 1978 Aug; 19(8):942-7. PubMed ID: 682026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a clinical scintillation camera with pulse tail extrapolation electronics.
    Lewellen TK; Bice AN; Pollard KR; Zhu JB; Plunkett ME
    J Nucl Med; 1989 Sep; 30(9):1554-8. PubMed ID: 2769408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A count-rate model for PET scanners using pixelated Anger-logic detectors with different scintillators.
    Surti S; Karp JS
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5697-715. PubMed ID: 16306662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of photon energy on tests of field uniformity in scintillation cameras: concise communication.
    Lewis JT; Neff RA; Nishiyama H; Bahr GH
    J Nucl Med; 1978 May; 19(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 641580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deadtime measurements in scintillation cameras under scatter conditions simulating quantitative nuclear cardiography.
    Adams R; Hine GJ; Zimmerman CD
    J Nucl Med; 1978 May; 19(5):538-44. PubMed ID: 641578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A field procedure for the quantitative assessment of nuclear imaging cameras.
    Lewellen TK; Williams DL; Murano R; Hamilton GW; Nelp WB
    J Nucl Med; 1978 Aug; 19(8):954-8. PubMed ID: 682029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Artifacts in iodine-131 renal images due to coincidence summing of technetium-99m photons.
    Harris CC; Wilkinson RH; Schuler FR
    Radiology; 1983 Feb; 146(2):505-7. PubMed ID: 6849100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Theoretical studies of image artifacts and counting losses for different photon fluence rates and pulse-height distributions in single-crystal NaI(T1) scintillation cameras.
    Strand SE; Lamm IL
    J Nucl Med; 1980 Mar; 21(3):264-75. PubMed ID: 7365519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of two methods of measuring gamma camera uniformity.
    Pearson D; Kapasi T
    Nucl Med Commun; 1988 Jan; 9(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 3386973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital scintigraphy: principles, design, and performance.
    Genna S; Pang SC; Smith A
    J Nucl Med; 1981 Apr; 22(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 7205384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The count rate performance of a multiwire gamma camera measured by a decaying source method with 9.3-minute tantalum-178.
    Adams R; Lacy JL; Ball ME; Martin LJ
    J Nucl Med; 1990 Oct; 31(10):1723-6. PubMed ID: 2213198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Front-illuminated versus back-illuminated photon-counting CCD-based gamma camera: important consequences for spatial resolution and energy resolution.
    Heemskerk JW; Westra AH; Linotte PM; Ligtvoet KM; Zbijewski W; Beekman FJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):N149-62. PubMed ID: 17404450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.