153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6417049)
1. The removal of Mr. Herbert's feeding tube.
Steinbock B
Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):13-6. PubMed ID: 6417049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Court responses to withholding or withdrawing artificial nutrition and fluids.
Paris JJ; Reardon FE
JAMA; 1985 Apr; 253(15):2243-5. PubMed ID: 3919194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Must patients always be given food and water?
Lynn J; Childress JF
Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):17-21. PubMed ID: 6417050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is a decision to forgo tube feeding for another a decision to kill?
Smith WB
Issues Law Med; 1991; 6(4):385-94. PubMed ID: 1903780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Criminal law--homicide--removal of intravenous feeding line from vegetative, comatose patient at family's request is not murder. Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (1983).
Crook RR
Cumberland Law Rev; 1984-1985; 15(1):225-37. PubMed ID: 11652439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. On feeding the dying.
Callahan D
Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):22. PubMed ID: 6417051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is a decision to forgo tube feeding for another a decision to kill?
Brodeur D
Issues Law Med; 1991; 6(4):395-406. PubMed ID: 1903781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Removing life support: motivations, obligations. An opinion on NCCB Committee for Pro-Life Activities' statement on artificial hydration and nutrition.
O'Rourke KD; deBlois J
Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):20-7, 38. PubMed ID: 10119534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Substitute consent. Reconciling negative treatment and consent to routine medical treatment.
Sappington GM
J Leg Med; 1986 Sep; 7(3):341-55. PubMed ID: 3490528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Termination of life support systems in the elderly. Discussion: To die before the gods please: legal issues surrounding euthanasia and the elderly.
Baron CH
J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1981; 14(1):45-70. PubMed ID: 7343584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A 'natural law' reconsideration of euthanasia.
Cahill LS
Linacre Q; 1977 Feb; 44(1):47-63. PubMed ID: 11661396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Euthanasia: a Christian view.
Hare RM
Philos Exch; 1975; 2(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 11662246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. On ending life.
Childress JF
Criterion; 1978; 17(2):4-8. PubMed ID: 11652371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the continued provision of food and fluids in Nancy Cruzan's best interests?
Harris CE; Bostrom BA
Issues Law Med; 1990; 5(4):415-35. PubMed ID: 2108099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. At my moribund father's bedside.
Falk ZW
Shma; 1992 May; 22(435):113-5. PubMed ID: 11651404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Distinguishing between active and passive euthanasia.
Gert B; Culver CM
Clin Geriatr Med; 1986 Feb; 2(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 3082503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New ANA guidelines on withdrawing or withholding food and fluid from patients.
Fry ST
Nurs Outlook; 1988; 36(3):122-3, 148-50. PubMed ID: 3130614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Failure to feed: an ethical and legal discussion.
Horan DJ
Issues Law Med; 1986 Sep; 2(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 3095263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Dehumanization triumphant.
Kass LR
First Things; 1996; 65():15-6. PubMed ID: 11654487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The constitutional right to suicide, the quality of life, and the "slippery slope": an explicit reply to lingering concerns.
Neeley GS
Akron Law Rev; 1994; 28(1):53-76. PubMed ID: 11660026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
