These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6417052)
1. The doctor, the patient, & the DRG. Wasserman J Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):23-5. PubMed ID: 6417052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Quality of medical database to valorize the DRG model by ISA cost indicators]. Holstein J; Taright N; Lepage E; Razafimamonjy J; Duboc D; Feldman L; Hittinger L; Lavergne T; Chatellier G Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2002 Dec; 50(6):593-603. PubMed ID: 12515929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of costs and benefits of management of gestational diabetes mellitus. Kitzmiller JL; Elixhauser A; Carr S; Major CA; de Veciana M; Dang-Kilduff L; Weschler JM Diabetes Care; 1998 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():B123-30. PubMed ID: 9704239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of cost accounting methods from different DRG systems and their effect on health care quality. Leister JE; Stausberg J Health Policy; 2005 Sep; 74(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 16098411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DRGs: what's the future bottom line for health care? Chenoweth J Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Mar; 4(3):32-45. PubMed ID: 10310489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost and quality: two sides of the coin in cost containment. Clifford LA; Plomann MP Healthc Financ Manage; 1985 Sep; 39(9):30-2. PubMed ID: 10311240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical redesign using all patient refined diagnosis related groups. Sedman AB; Bahl V; Bunting E; Bandy K; Jones S; Nasr SZ; Schulz K; Campbell DA Pediatrics; 2004 Oct; 114(4):965-9. PubMed ID: 15466092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A physician looks at DRGs. Lang HL West J Med; 1984 Aug; 141(2):248-55. PubMed ID: 6437081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. One health maintenance organization's experience: obstetric costs depend more on staffing patterns than on mode of delivery. Finkler MD; Wirtschafter DD J Perinatol; 1997; 17(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 9134516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of actual registered costs and costs derived from diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) for patients undergoing heart transplantation, lung transplantation, and thoracotomy for other lung diseases. Mishra V; Skeie B; Vaaler S; Amlie E Transpl Int; 2001 Dec; 14(6):361-9. PubMed ID: 11793033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perspectives. DRGs and quality of care. Wash Rep Med Health; 1985 Jan; 39(1):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10311094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Critical appraisal of the DRG system. Problem areas for DRG reimbursement in the U.S.A. Harper DL Aust Health Rev; 1985; 8(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 10311188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: wise use of finite resources? A view from the trenches. Druzin ML; El-Sayed YY Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):305-8. PubMed ID: 17011403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluating the first German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) in cardiological patients: problems in the correct medical and economic grouping]. Reinecke H; Bunzemeier H; Fürstenberg T; Rothenburger M; Böcker D; Scheld HH; Breithardt G; Roeder N Z Kardiol; 2003 Jul; 92(7):581-94. PubMed ID: 12883843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Structure and performance of different DRG classification systems for neonatal medicine. Muldoon JH Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):302-18. PubMed ID: 9917473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]