These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6417253)

  • 1. Utilization review based on practitioner profiles.
    Mullin RL
    J Med Syst; 1983 Oct; 7(5):409-12. PubMed ID: 6417253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An effective utilization review program using accurate management information.
    Hoyt JP
    Healthc Comput Commun; 1985 Jan; 2(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 10310975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between diagnostic information available at admission and discharge for patients in one PSRO setting: implications for concurrent review.
    Burford R; Averill RF
    Med Care; 1979 Apr; 17(4):369-81. PubMed ID: 571034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utilization review altered to advantage.
    Brown DE; Levy JD
    Hospitals; 1980 Mar; 54(5):83-6. PubMed ID: 7188763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of hospital beds: a cohort study of admissions to a provincial teaching hospital.
    Anderson P; Meara J; Brodhurst S; Attwood S; Timbrell M; Gatherer A
    BMJ; 1988 Oct; 297(6653):910-2. PubMed ID: 3140977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of concurrent feedback in reducing inappropriate hospital utilization.
    Restuccia JD
    Med Care; 1982 Jan; 20(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 7043116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the use of narrow age ranges in setting review dates for pediatric patients.
    Ament RP
    PAS Rep; 1978 Mar; 16(3):33-9. PubMed ID: 10308496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concurrent clinical review: using microcomputer-based DRG-software.
    Huertas-Portocarrero D; Ruiz PP; Marmol JP
    Health Policy; 1988; 9(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 10312511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient assessment in symphony.
    Simonides D
    Comput Healthc; 1987 Nov; 8(13):48-50. PubMed ID: 10284459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrospective utilization review as a focused method of evaluation.
    Hunter SA
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1980 Feb; 6(2):11-2. PubMed ID: 6785683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concurrent chart analysis and DRG assignment in a prospective payment environment.
    Shlala TJ
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Nov; 59(11):34-40. PubMed ID: 10312715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel plan simplifies review, saves money.
    Borchardt PJ
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 Nov; 3(11):147-8. PubMed ID: 10273106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The reliability of medical records.
    Still S
    J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1980 Aug; 51(4):20-7. PubMed ID: 10248615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concurrent medical record analysis in a community hospital.
    Lee MP
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 Jun; 55(6):45-7. PubMed ID: 10310655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality assurance: a concurrent monitoring system.
    Grabowski BS
    Top Hosp Pharm Manage; 1988 Feb; 7(4):8-13. PubMed ID: 10314270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The development and implementation of a drug utilization review program.
    Lazor-Bajcar JM; Fowler R
    Can J Hosp Pharm; 1988 Feb; 41(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 10286608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer-assisted concurrent antibiotic review in a community hospital.
    Scarafile PD; Campbell BD; Kilroy JE; Mathewson HO
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1985 Feb; 42(2):313-5. PubMed ID: 3838416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a new strategy for continued stay review in hospitals.
    Hirsch EO; Rimm AA; Welsch RG
    Med Care; 1977 Nov; 15(11):906-14. PubMed ID: 926872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review ensures quick response to faulty care.
    Sherber J
    Hospitals; 1980 Aug; 54(15):55-7. PubMed ID: 7390465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of computerized utilization review on patterns of psychiatric inpatient care.
    Ramirez LF; McCormick RA; Hull A; Hussey S
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1987 Sep; 38(9):977-82. PubMed ID: 3119455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.