These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6417752)

  • 1. A method for determining the sampling ratio in epidemiologic studies.
    Morgenstern H; Winn DM
    Stat Med; 1983; 2(3):387-96. PubMed ID: 6417752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample sizes for estimation of exposure-specific disease rates in population-based case-control studies.
    Mullooly JP
    Am J Epidemiol; 1987 Jun; 125(6):1079-84. PubMed ID: 3578246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applicability of sample size calculations based on a comparison of proportions for use with the logrank test.
    Gail MH
    Control Clin Trials; 1985 Jun; 6(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 4006484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample sizes for group sequential cohort and case-control study designs.
    Pasternack BS; Shore RE
    Am J Epidemiol; 1981 Feb; 113(2):182-91. PubMed ID: 7468575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample-size calculations in segregation analysis.
    Wong FL; Rotter JI
    Am J Hum Genet; 1984 Nov; 36(6):1279-97. PubMed ID: 6517052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Planning a cohort or case-control study with allowance for cost and test power.
    Moussa MA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1985 Aug; 20(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 3850016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal allocation for the comparison of proportions.
    Brittain E; Schlesselman JJ
    Biometrics; 1982 Dec; 38(4):1003-9. PubMed ID: 7168791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Including sampling and phenotyping costs into the optimization of two stage designs for genomewide association studies.
    Müller HH; Pahl R; Schäfer H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):844-52. PubMed ID: 17549751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple approximation for calculating sample sizes for comparing independent proportions.
    Fleiss JL; Tytun A; Ury HK
    Biometrics; 1980 Jun; 36(2):343-6. PubMed ID: 26625475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A two stage design for the study of the relationship between a rare exposure and a rare disease.
    White JE
    Am J Epidemiol; 1982 Jan; 115(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 7055123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal and maximin sample sizes for multicentre cost-effectiveness trials.
    Manju MA; Candel MJ; Berger MP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Oct; 24(5):513-39. PubMed ID: 25656551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient design of cluster randomized and multicentre trials with unknown intraclass correlation.
    van Breukelen GJ; Candel MJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Oct; 24(5):540-56. PubMed ID: 21937473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The feasibility of matching and quota sampling in epidemiologic studies.
    Walter SD
    Am J Epidemiol; 1989 Aug; 130(2):379-89. PubMed ID: 2665478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-efficient case-control cluster sampling designs for population-based epidemiological studies.
    Ly T; Cockburn M; Langholz B
    Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 26():95-105. PubMed ID: 30390934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost efficiency in study planning and completion. How many cases? How many controls?
    Rosenberg MJ
    Am J Med; 1983 Nov; 75(5):833-8. PubMed ID: 6416065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choosing the number of controls in a matched case-control study, some sample size, power and efficiency considerations.
    Taylor JM
    Stat Med; 1986; 5(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 3961313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Note on comparison of small proportions in large-scale experiments.
    Pierce DA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1977 May; 58(5):1501-2. PubMed ID: 857037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Estimation methods in a sampling survey].
    Warszawski J; Lellouch J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1997 Apr; 45(2):150-68. PubMed ID: 9221444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Value of information analysis optimizing future trial design from a pilot study on catheter securement devices.
    Tuffaha HW; Reynolds H; Gordon LG; Rickard CM; Scuffham PA
    Clin Trials; 2014 Dec; 11(6):648-56. PubMed ID: 25084784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relative efficiencies of matched and independent sample designs for case-control studies.
    Thomas DC; Greenland S
    J Chronic Dis; 1983; 36(10):685-97. PubMed ID: 6630405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.