108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6417962)
1. Prognostic value of the staging system proposed by Merlini, Waldenström and Jayakar for multiple myeloma.
Bettini R; Steidl L; Rapazzini P; Giardina G
Acta Haematol; 1983; 70(6):379-85. PubMed ID: 6417962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Prognostic factors in IgG and micromolecular multiple myeloma. Retrospective analysis of 50 consecutive cases].
Pasqualetti P; Casale R; Colantonio D; Festuccia V; Di Lauro G; Natali G
Minerva Med; 1987 May; 78(9):603-8. PubMed ID: 3587727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Merlini, Waldenström, Jayakar staging system revisited.
Merlini G; Gobbi PG; Ascari E
Eur J Haematol Suppl; 1989; 51():105-10. PubMed ID: 2697581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Classification and prognostic evaluation in multiple myeloma. A retrospective study of relationship of survivals and responses to chemotherapy to immunological types, 20 single prognostic factors, 15 clinical staging systems, and 6 morphological classifications.
Pasqualetti P; Colantonio D; Collacciani A; Casale R; Natali G
Panminerva Med; 1991; 33(2):93-110. PubMed ID: 1923560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparative study of 2 prognostic classification systems for myeloma and examination of the correlation between initial bone marrow plasmacytosis and prognosis. A propos of a homogeneous population of 50 patients followed from diagnosis to death].
Pesce A; Cassuto JP; Grisot C; Gratecos N; Bayle J; Viot G; Dujardin P
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1983; 25(5):311-7. PubMed ID: 6657481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Critical considerations on a comparative study of two staging systems for multiple myeloma.
Merlini G; Jayakar D
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1984; 26(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 6527945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of two staging systems for myeloma.
Vercelli D; Cozzolino F; Di Guglielmo R
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1981; 23(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 7290984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new improved clinical staging system for multiple myeloma based on analysis of 123 treated patients.
Merlini G; Waldenström JG; Jayakar SD
Blood; 1980 Jun; 55(6):1011-9. PubMed ID: 7378577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic factors and classification in multiple myeloma.
San Miguel JF; Sànchez J; Gonzalez M
Br J Cancer; 1989 Jan; 59(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 2757917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic factors affecting the survival of patients with multiple myeloma. A retrospective analysis of 86 patients.
Rapoport BL; Falkson HC; Falkson G
S Afr Med J; 1991 Jan; 79(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 1989088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic factors and staging in multiple myeloma: a reappraisal.
Bataille R; Durie BG; Grenier J; Sany J
J Clin Oncol; 1986 Jan; 4(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 3510284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic factors in multiple myeloma: a new staging system based on clinical and morphological features.
Pasqualetti P; Casale R; Collacciani A; Colantonio D
Eur J Cancer; 1991; 27(9):1123-6. PubMed ID: 1835621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic significance of stratification systems in multiple myeloma. I. Risk categories (good and poor risk).
Scudla V; Indrák K
Neoplasma; 1985; 32(4):469-79. PubMed ID: 4047258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Prognostic evaluation in multiple myeloma. Relationship between immunological types, single prognostic factors, clinical staging systems, morphological classification systems and survival].
Pasqualetti P; Colantonio D; Casale R; Di Lauro G; Collacciani A; Festuccia V; Trotta A; Natali G
Ann Ital Med Int; 1990; 5(3 Pt 1):195-204. PubMed ID: 2288822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biclonal gammopathy in multiple myeloma: a case report.
Bakta IM; Sutarka IN
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2000 May; 27 Suppl 2():544-8. PubMed ID: 10895208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Selection using multivariate analysis].
Pasqualetti P; Colantonio D; Casale R; Lorenzetti G; Natali G
Recenti Prog Med; 1989 Oct; 80(10):543-6. PubMed ID: 2602637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Reproducibility of a mathematical model for calculating survival in multiple myeloma].
Pasqualetti P; Casale R; Colantonio D
Medicina (Firenze); 1989; 9(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 2811644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Staging systems for multiple myeloma: a comparison.
Gassmann W; Pralle H; Haferlach T; Pandurevic S; Graubner M; Schmitz N; Löffler H
Br J Haematol; 1985 Apr; 59(4):703-11. PubMed ID: 3986136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic factors and staging systems of multiple myeloma:
Tao ZF; Fu WJ; Yuan ZG; Wang DX; Chen YB; Hou J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Oct; 120(19):1655-8. PubMed ID: 17935664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic factors in IgD myeloma: a study of 21 cases.
Fibbe WE; Jansen J
Scand J Haematol; 1984 Nov; 33(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 6515330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
