365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6419029)
1. A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams.
Med Phys; 1983; 10(6):741-71. PubMed ID: 6419029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the FBX dosemeter for the calibration of cobalt-60 and high-energy teletherapy machines.
Gupta BL; Kini UR; Bhat RM; Madhvanath U
Phys Med Biol; 1982 Feb; 27(2):235-45. PubMed ID: 6803265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cobalt-60 gamma-ray beams.
McKenzie AL
BJR Suppl; 1996; 25():46-61. PubMed ID: 9068356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of lead acrylic as a filter for contaminant electrons in megavoltage photon beams.
Huang D; Williams S; Chaney E; Long F
Med Phys; 1983; 10(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 6405146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the AAPM "Protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams" with currently used protocols.
Hunt MA; Malik S; Thomason C; Masterson ME
Med Phys; 1984; 11(6):806-13. PubMed ID: 6439991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality assurance network in central Europe. External audit on output calibration for photon beams.
Izewska J; Novotny J; Gwiazdowska B; Kindlova A; Kontra G; van Dam J; Dutreix A; van der Schueren E
Acta Oncol; 1995; 34(6):829-38. PubMed ID: 7576752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of physical parameters associated with the measurement of high-energy x-ray penumbra.
Dawson DJ; Harper JM; Akinradewo AC
Med Phys; 1984; 11(4):491-7. PubMed ID: 6434915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the NMIJ and the ARPANSA standards for absorbed dose to water in high-energy photon beams.
Shimizu M; Morishita Y; Kato M; Tanaka T; Kurosawa T; Takata N; Saito N; Ramanathan G; Harty PD; Oliver C; Wright T; Butler DJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 25209996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Routine determination of cobalt-60 standard exposure as a control of the system radiation source-mechanics-dosimeter].
Eipper HH
Strahlentherapie; 1974 Feb; 147(2):189-200. PubMed ID: 4849668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Calibration in water versus calibration in air for cobalt-60 gamma rays.
Grant WH; Cundiff JH; Gagnon WF; Hanson WF; Shalek RJ
Med Phys; 1977; 4(1):68-9. PubMed ID: 840192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A study of dose distribution patterns from cobalt-60 and Varian Clinac-4 beams.
Nair R; Kartha M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jan; 130(1):150-3. PubMed ID: 413401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The calibration of plane parallel ionisation chambers for the measurement of absorbed dose in electron beams of low to medium energies. Part 1: the NACP chamber.
Cross P; Freeman N
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Sep; 19(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 8936730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Dosimetry and irradiation methods in electron therapy].
Rassow J
Strahlentherapie; 1974 Nov; 148(5):475-96. PubMed ID: 4216991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose in the buildup region outside the primary beam.
Horton JL
Med Phys; 1984; 11(3):331-4. PubMed ID: 6429500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality assurance control in the EORTC cooperative group of radiotherapy. 2. Dosimetric intercomparison.
Johansson KA; Horiot JC; Van Dam J; Lepinoy D; Sentenac I; Sernbo G
Radiother Oncol; 1986 Nov; 7(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 3809589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Point/Counterpoint. Calibration of radiotherapy ionization chambers using Co-60 is outdated and should be replaced by direct calibration in linear accelerator beams.
Ganesan R; McEwen MR; Orton CG
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5003-6. PubMed ID: 26328950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of recent codes of practice for high-energy photon dosimetry.
Mijnheer BJ; Wittkämper FW
Phys Med Biol; 1986 Apr; 31(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 3090570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Backscattered dose perturbation effects at metallic interfaces irradiated by high-energy X- and gamma-ray therapeutic beams.
Ravikumar M; Ravichandran R; Sathiyan S; Supe SS
Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Mar; 180(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 14991206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of different protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Mattsson O
Radiother Oncol; 1985 Dec; 4(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 4081121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. IAEA/WHO 60Co teletherapy dosimetry service using mailed LiF dosimeters. A survey of results obtained during 1975-1982.
Boyd AW; Eisenlohr HH
Med Phys; 1983; 10(4):491-2. PubMed ID: 6888365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
