232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6420993)
1. [Successes and failures in rhesus-prophylaxis].
Speiser P
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1983 Dec; 133(23-24):595-604. PubMed ID: 6420993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fifteen years' experience with post-partum Rh prophylaxis in Norway (1969-83): incidence of new cases of anti-D and other clinically important blood group antibodies in pregnant women.
Kornstad L
NIPH Ann; 1987 Jun; 10(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 3116469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Results of postpartum Rhesus prophylaxis 1967 to 1990].
Schlensker KH; Krüger AA
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1996 Sep; 56(9):494-500. PubMed ID: 8991849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Prophylaxis of Rh-sensitisation by intravenous IgG anti-D (author's transl)].
Börner P; Deicher H; Bähr I; Chelius HH; Ghani G; Geldmacher H; Henke IW; Kindermann L; Marks V
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1977 May; 102(20):745-51. PubMed ID: 405190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Obstetrical aspects in successes and failures of rhesus-prophylaxis].
Reinold E
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1983 Dec; 133(23-24):610-3. PubMed ID: 6420995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Rh (D) alloimmunization and pregnancy. Analysis of the causes after prophylaxis introduction].
Furundarena JR; Ibisate A; Burguete Y; González de Langarica E; González N; Urquiza R; Mendizabal A; Hernando N; Pérez Clausell C
Sangre (Barc); 1999 Dec; 44(6):429-33. PubMed ID: 10822755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Rhesus prophylaxis--history and current status].
Behrens O; Lellé RJ
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(5):204-10. PubMed ID: 9281253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Prevention of hemolytic disease in newborn infants using anti-D immunoglobulin G].
Mikulandra F; Perisa M; Merlak I; Kimer M; Glavadanović N
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1989; 111(7):444-52. PubMed ID: 2786664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Ante-partum administration of preventive treatment of Rh-D immunization in rhesus-negative women. Parallel evaluation of transplacental passage of fetal blood cells. Results of a multicenter study carried out in the Paris region].
Huchet J; Dallemagne S; Huchet C; Brossard Y; Larsen M; Parnet-Mathieu F
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1987; 16(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 3035003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The economics of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are rhesus negative.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Lloyd Jones M; Wight J; Forman K; Wray J; Beverley C
BJOG; 2004 Sep; 111(9):903-7. PubMed ID: 15327602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevention of rhesus immunization in Australia. The first seven years.
Davey MG
Med J Aust; 1975 Aug; 2(7):263-7. PubMed ID: 808697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Pediatric aspects of success and failure of anti-D-prophylaxis].
Fürnkranz H; Rosenkranz A
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1983 Dec; 133(23-24):607-10. PubMed ID: 6666162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The causes of failures in post partum Anti-D-prophylaxis. 2. Sensitizations prior to the administration of Anti-D-immunoglobulin (author's transl)].
Bartsch FK; Schneider J
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1973 Oct; 33(10):806-15. PubMed ID: 4203352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Controlled trial of various anti-D dosages in suppression of Rh sensitization following pregnancy. Report to the Medical Research Council by the working party on the use of anti-D-immunoglobulin for the prevention of isoimmunization of Rh-negative women during pregnancy.
Br Med J; 1974 Apr; 2(5910):75-80. PubMed ID: 4207590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Prevention of Rh sensitization using anti-D immunoglobulin. (An 8 year study)].
Spoljarić I; Majnarić M
Jugosl Ginekol Opstet; 1978; 18(5-6):417-22. PubMed ID: 119891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Advantages of preventing Rh isoimmunization].
Mikulandra F; Merlak I; Perisa M; Kapitanović Z; Barbetti V; Kimer M; Glavadanović N
Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1985; 25(1-2):29-34. PubMed ID: 3003466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rh immunization in Manitoba: progress in prevention and management.
Bowman JM; Pollock J
Can Med Assoc J; 1983 Aug; 129(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 6409390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Practical experiences with the anti-D-IgG prevention of Rh-immunization].
Bergmann H; Leinzinger E; Pazdernik I; Haider M
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1969 Jan; 119(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 4975236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The causes of failures in post partum Anti-D-prophylaxis. 1. Technical errors and feto-maternal transfusions (author's transl)].
Schneider J; Bartsch FK
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1973 Oct; 33(10):798-805. PubMed ID: 4203351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Total prevention of Rh hemolytic disease: possible or impossible?
Bowman JM
Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 1981; 3(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 6169290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
