These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6424173)

  • 41. Disruption and migration of an Angelchik esophageal antireflux prosthesis.
    Pickleman J
    Surgery; 1983 Mar; 93(3):467-8. PubMed ID: 6829015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A serious complication of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Boeree NR; Armstrong CP; Brown C; Pickering B
    Br J Surg; 1988 Aug; 75(8):826-7. PubMed ID: 3048530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Normal lower-esophageal-sphincter function after surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux.
    Lipshutz WH; Eckert RJ; Gaskins RD; Blanton DE; Lukash WM
    N Engl J Med; 1974 Nov; 291(21):1107-10. PubMed ID: 4417633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis.
    Watson A
    Br J Surg; 1985 Nov; 72(11):935-6. PubMed ID: 4063771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1990 Jan; 72(1):69. PubMed ID: 2301909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Erosions of the angelchik prosthesis in pediatric-sized developmentally disabled patients.
    Jakaite D; Gourley GR; Pellett JR
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 1991 Aug; 13(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 1719176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The Angelchik prosthesis and gastroesophageal reflux.
    Sapala JA; Sapala MA; Hurtado M
    Ann Intern Med; 1983 Aug; 99(2):280. PubMed ID: 6881791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Development of an adjustable prosthesis for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux: preliminary results in a porcine model.
    Carugno F; Donohue JH; Moreno E; Byrne J; Hodge DO; Ilstrup DM; Sarr MG
    ASAIO J; 1998; 44(3):140-3. PubMed ID: 9617942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Intra-abdominal migration of an antireflux prosthesis. A cause of bizarre pain.
    Peloso OA
    JAMA; 1982 Jul; 248(3):351-3. PubMed ID: 7045436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Roentgen morphological aspects of the structure of the oesophagus (author's transl)].
    Ernst VH; Grönninger J
    Rofo; 1981 Jun; 134(6):674-7. PubMed ID: 6454631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [The Angelchik prosthesis in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux: a failed experiment].
    Goedkoop NM; de Smet HL
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1988 Jan; 132(3):111-4. PubMed ID: 3277070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Angelchik prosthesis: results and complications.
    Ritchie PD; Milkins R; Fleming EL; Nott D
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1987 Sep; 57(9):621-5. PubMed ID: 3689250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Angelchik prosthesis revisited.
    Varshney S; Kelly JJ; Branagan G; Somers SS; Kelly JM
    World J Surg; 2002 Jan; 26(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 11898046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. Effects on the lower esophageal sphincter of primates.
    Benjamin SB; Knuff TK; Fink M; Woods E; Castell DO
    Ann Surg; 1983 Jan; 197(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 6848055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Gastrojejunal and gastroesophageal fistulae following placement of an Angelchik prosthesis.
    Ell SR
    JAMA; 1984 Dec; 252(21):2961-2. PubMed ID: 6502856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Diagnostic and therapeutic technology assessment. Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.
    JAMA; 1986 Sep; 256(10):1358-60. PubMed ID: 3747052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Severe dysphagia from an Angelchik prosthesis: futility of routine esophageal testing.
    Demmy TL; Caron NR; Curtis JJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1994 Jun; 57(6):1660-1. PubMed ID: 8010825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Roentgenologic evaluation of the fundus of the stomach].
    Deimer E; Canigiani G; Wolf G
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1972 May; 122(21):300-5. PubMed ID: 5030151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. National survey of use of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.
    Morris DL; Robertson CS; Hardcastle JD
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 Aug; 295(6593):308-9. PubMed ID: 3115425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Complications of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.
    Gear MW; Gillison EW; Dowling BL
    Ann Intern Med; 1985 Dec; 103(6 ( Pt 1)):959. PubMed ID: 4062106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.