141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6424602)
1. [Long-term results of heterografts in the mitral position].
Ben Ismail M; Kafsi N; Ayari M
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1984 Feb; 77(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 6424602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Mitral valve replacement with bioprosthesis in children].
Mostefa-Kara M; Blin D; Langlet F; Mouly A; Goudard A; Montiès JR
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1984 Feb; 77(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 6424600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long term results of mitral valve replacement with preservation of the posterior leaflet.
Katircioglu F; Yamak B; Battaloglu B; Saritas A; Kiziltepe U; Kural T; Tasdemir O; Bayazit K
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 May; 5(3):302-6. PubMed ID: 8793680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Structural changes of Hancock bioprostheses in children (author's transl)].
Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Callucci V; Valente M; Del Maschio A; Valfrè C; Thiene G
G Ital Cardiol; 1980; 10(11):1520-5. PubMed ID: 7202899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early and late risk of mitral valve replacement. A 12 year concomitant comparison of the porcine bioprosthetic and prosthetic disc mitral valves.
Cohn LH; Allred EN; Cohn LA; Austin JC; Sabik J; DiSesa VJ; Shemin RJ; Collins JJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Dec; 90(6):872-81. PubMed ID: 4068737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of simultaneous myocardial revascularization on operative risk, functional result, and survival following mitral valve replacement.
Miller DC; Stinson EB; Rossiter SJ; Oyer PE; Reitz BA; Shumway NE
Surgery; 1978 Dec; 84(6):848-57. PubMed ID: 568831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Late failure of porcine valve heterografts in children.
Geha AS; Laks H; Stansel HC; Cornhill JF; Kilman JW; Buckley MJ; Roberts WC
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979 Sep; 78(3):351-64. PubMed ID: 470416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes?
Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term follow up of the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis in the mitral position.
Pomerantzeff PM; Brandão CM; Albuquerque JM; Stolf NA; Grinberg M; Oliveira SA
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Nov; 15(6):763-6; discussion 766-7. PubMed ID: 17152783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis in the mitral position: a 10-year follow up of St. Jude Medical and Biocor valves.
Demirag M; Kirali K; Omeroglu SN; Mansuroglu D; Akinci E; Ipek G; Berki T; Gürbüz A; Isik O; Yakut C
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 11206772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term follow-up after mitral valve replacement in childhood: poor event-free survival in the young child.
Beierlein W; Becker V; Yates R; Tsang V; Elliott M; de Leval M; van Doorn C
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 May; 31(5):860-5. PubMed ID: 17383889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Midpoint follow-up results of aortic valve replacement with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial bioprosthesis. Apropos of 109 patients].
Michel PL; Kassab R; Vahanian A; Belkaid M; Acar J
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1986 Jun; 79(7):1046-51. PubMed ID: 3096227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reconstructive surgery of mitral valve incompetence: ten-year appraisal.
Carpentier A; Chauvaud S; Fabiani JN; Deloche A; Relland J; Lessana A; D'Allaines C; Blondeau P; Piwnica A; Dubost C
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Mar; 79(3):338-48. PubMed ID: 7354634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The long term (15 years) evolution after valvular replacement with mechanical prosthesis or bioprosthesis between the age of 60 and 70 years].
Hanania G; Michel PL; Montély JM; Warembourg H; Nardi O; Leguerrier A; Agnino A; Despins P; Legault B; Petit H; Bouraindeloup M;
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2004 Jan; 97(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 15002704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Fate of Starr-Edwards prostheses in the mitral position. Prognostic factors. Apropos of 309 cases].
Ben Ismail M; Kafsi N; Cormier B; Trabelsi S
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1984 Aug; 77(8):930-6. PubMed ID: 6435571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Conservative surgery of the mitral valve. Immediate and late results].
Lessana A; Romano M; Guérin F; Fouchard J; Adès F; Kara SM; Lefèvre JJ; Perron D; Palsky E
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1985 Dec; 78(13):1928-34. PubMed ID: 3938645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Twelve-year follow up with the Sorin Pericarbon bioprosthesis in the mitral position.
Caimmi PP; Di Summa M; Galloni M; Gastaldi L; Papillo B; Actis Dato GM; Agaccio G; Donegani E; Poletti G; Morea M
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Jul; 7(4):400-6. PubMed ID: 9697061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Mitral valve replacement in young children: a long-term follow-up].
Grillo R; Rubino A; Pipitone S; Pieri D; Donzelli M; Patanè L; Sperandeo V
G Ital Cardiol; 1990 Jan; 20(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 2328855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]