These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 642487)

  • 21. Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Léger AC; Reed CM; Desloge JG; Swaminathan J; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):389-403. PubMed ID: 26233038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Limiting spectral resolution in speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Turner CW; Chi SL; Flock S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Aug; 42(4):773-84. PubMed ID: 10450899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Rankovic CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1043-57. PubMed ID: 9479758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dichotic listening in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Roeser RJ; Johns DF; Price LL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 2(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 965275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Hogan CA; Turner CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):432-41. PubMed ID: 9670535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):420-36. PubMed ID: 20440116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Performance of noise-induced hearing-impaired listeners on time-compressed consonant-nucleus-consonant monosyllables.
    Kurdziel SA; Rintelmann WF; Beasley DS
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1975; 1(2):54-60. PubMed ID: 1232075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adaptive speech audiometry and speech discrimination space in hearing-impaired subjects.
    Stevenson PW; Martin MC
    Audiology; 1977; 16(2):110-23. PubMed ID: 849207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Consonant-feature transmission as a function of presentation level in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Gutnick HN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Oct; 72(4):1124-30. PubMed ID: 7142577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicting consonant confusions from acoustic analysis.
    Dubno JR; Levitt H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jan; 69(1):249-61. PubMed ID: 7217523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Within-consonant perceptual differences in the hearing impaired ear.
    Trevino A; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):607-17. PubMed ID: 23862835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of acoustic modification on consonant recognition by elderly hearing-impaired subjects.
    Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Apr; 81(4):1199-202. PubMed ID: 3571732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Consonant-vowel intensity ratios for maximizing consonant recognition by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kennedy E; Levitt H; Neuman AC; Weiss M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1098-114. PubMed ID: 9479764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Consonant similarity judgments by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Walden BE; Montgomery AA; Prosek RA; Schwartz DM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Mar; 23(1):162-84. PubMed ID: 7442174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
    Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Temporal acuity in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jesteadt W; Bilger RC; Green DM; Patterson JH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Jun; 19(2):357-70. PubMed ID: 979204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of Expanding Envelope Fluctuations on Consonant Perception in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Wiinberg A; Zaar J; Dau T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518775293. PubMed ID: 29756553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.