These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 642487)

  • 41. Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Zurek PM; Delhorne LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Nov; 82(5):1548-59. PubMed ID: 3693695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):355-64. PubMed ID: 2921418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Turner CW; Souza PE; Forget LN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2568-76. PubMed ID: 7714274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of a single-channel wide dynamic range compression circuit on perception of stop consonant place of articulation.
    Hedrick MS; Rice T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Oct; 43(5):1174-84. PubMed ID: 11063239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults.
    Harkrider AW; Plyler PN; Hedrick MS
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Consonant recognition in quiet as a function of aging among normal hearing subjects.
    Gelfand SA; Piper N; Silman S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Oct; 78(4):1198-206. PubMed ID: 4056214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24. PubMed ID: 8550937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effect of combining low- and high-frequency passbands on consonant recognition in the hearing impaired.
    Franklin B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Dec; 18(4):719-27. PubMed ID: 1207102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Temporal intraspeech masking of plosive bursts: effects of hearing loss and frequency shaping.
    Mackersie CL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):554-63. PubMed ID: 17538099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1666-75. PubMed ID: 2708682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Assessing the efficacy of hearing-aid amplification using a phoneme test.
    Scheidiger C; Allen JB; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1739. PubMed ID: 28372055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Tone-glide discrimination: normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Collins MJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Sep; 27(3):403-12. PubMed ID: 6482410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Perceptual weighting of relative amplitude and formant transition cues in aided CV syllables.
    Hedrick M; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Oct; 44(5):964-74. PubMed ID: 11708536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Discrimination of interaural temporal disparities by normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Smoski WJ; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 May; 79(5):1541-7. PubMed ID: 3711453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.
    Vickers DA; Moore BC; Baer T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1164-75. PubMed ID: 11519583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception.
    Drullman R; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 May; 95(5 Pt 1):2670-80. PubMed ID: 8207140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Identification and discrimination of a synthesized voicing contrast by normal and sensorineural hearing-impaired children.
    Parady S; Dorman MF; Whaley P; Raphael LJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Mar; 69(3):783-90. PubMed ID: 7240559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Predicting effects of hearing-instrument signal processing on consonant perception.
    Zaar J; Schmitt N; Derleth RP; DiNino M; Arenberg JG; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):3216. PubMed ID: 29195458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.