BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6425467)

  • 1. Nursing care requirements as measured by DRG.
    Lagona TG; Stritzel MM
    J Nurs Adm; 1984 May; 14(5):15-8. PubMed ID: 6425467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nursing costs/DRG: a patient classification system and comparative study.
    Fosbinder D
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Nov; 16(11):18-23. PubMed ID: 3093645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do DRG reimbursement rates reflect nursing costs?
    Mowry MM; Korpman RA
    J Nurs Adm; 1985; 15(7-8):29-35. PubMed ID: 3926966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accounting for nursing costs by DRG.
    Reschak GL; Biordi D; Holm K; Santucci N
    J Nurs Adm; 1985 Sep; 15(9):15-20. PubMed ID: 3928840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DRG panic.
    Nyberg J; Wolff N
    J Nurs Adm; 1984 Apr; 14(4):17-21. PubMed ID: 6423786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Costing out nursing: combining PCSs (patient classification systems), DRGs, and standards of care.
    Kyle BA; Kinder S
    Health Care Superv; 1990 Jan; 8(2):46-56. PubMed ID: 10113073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determining true nursing costs improves financial planning.
    Payson AA
    Health Prog; 1987 May; 68(4):50-1, 80. PubMed ID: 10312018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ICD-9-CM DRGs: increased homogeneity through use of AS-SCORE.
    Panniers TL; Tomkiewicz ZM
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1985 Feb; 11(2):47-52. PubMed ID: 3920601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of patient acuity and nursing resource use.
    Grohar ME; Myers J; McSweeney M
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Jun; 16(6):19-23. PubMed ID: 3086524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Building a classification system that works.
    Unger J
    J Nurs Adm; 1985; 15(7-8):18-24. PubMed ID: 3926964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nursing cost by DRG: nursing intensity weights.
    Knauf RA; Ballard K; Mossman PN; Lichtig LK
    Policy Polit Nurs Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 17242393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementing a DRG-driven acuity system for nurse staffing under prospective hospital payment.
    Caterinicchio RP
    Hosp Top; 1985; 63(3):6-7, 13. PubMed ID: 10311121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computerization of patient acuity and nursing care planning. New approach to improved patient care and cost-effective staffing.
    Adams R; Duchene P
    J Nurs Adm; 1985 Apr; 15(4):11-7. PubMed ID: 3845089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining cost of direct nursing care by DRGs.
    Mitchell M; Miller J; Welches L; Walker DD
    Nurs Manage; 1984 Apr; 15(4):29-32. PubMed ID: 6431340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Amalgam of nursing acuity, DRGs and costs.
    Sovie MD; Tarcinale MA; VanPutee AW; Stunden AE
    Nurs Manage; 1985 Mar; 16(3):22-42. PubMed ID: 3919345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acuity and staffing under prospective payment.
    Adams R; Johnson B
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Oct; 16(10):21-5. PubMed ID: 3093644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primary nursing. The impact on nursing costs within DRGs.
    Wolf GA; Lesic LK; Leak AG
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Mar; 16(3):9-11. PubMed ID: 3081696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accounting for nursing functions in DRGs.
    Piper LR
    Nurs Manage; 1983 Nov; 14(11):46-8. PubMed ID: 6422364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring variations in nursing care per DRG.
    Ballard KA; Gray RF; Knauf RA; Uppal P
    Nurs Manage; 1993 Apr; 24(4):33-6, 40-1. PubMed ID: 8474748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Management of nursing intensity.
    Thompson JD; Diers D
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1988 Sep; 23(3):473-92. PubMed ID: 3138665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.