287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6425468)
21. [Efforts to prepare work schedule acceptable for all nurses on wards. Good work schedule leads to better patient care and better colleagueship].
Toriumi F
Kango; 1994 Feb; 46(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 7996781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Nursing costs/DRG: a patient classification system and comparative study.
Fosbinder D
J Nurs Adm; 1986 Nov; 16(11):18-23. PubMed ID: 3093645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Patient classification and standards for nursing quality (II). Documentation of patients' need for nursing care as an administrative tool for personnel policy].
Ruland C
Fag Tidsskr Sykepleien; 1989 Nov; 77(19):13-6. PubMed ID: 2638160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Optimizing of the utilization of nurses. Quality and costs].
Mercx RJ
Tijdschr Ziekenverpl; 1985 Oct; 38(21):638-42. PubMed ID: 3852564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Using registry nurses: coping with cost and quality issues.
Sheridan DR; Bronstein JE; Walker DD
J Nurs Adm; 1982 Oct; 12(10):26-34. PubMed ID: 6924953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Learning to live with DRGs: the New Jersey experience.
Becker BL
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1983 Jul; 15(7):35-41. PubMed ID: 10310249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Determining cost of direct nursing care by DRGs.
Mitchell M; Miller J; Welches L; Walker DD
Nurs Manage; 1984 Apr; 15(4):29-32. PubMed ID: 6431340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Hospital restructuring: identifying the impact on patients and nurses.
Finlayson MP; Gower SE
Nurs Prax N Z; 2002 Mar; 18(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 12113142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effects of All-RN and RN-EN staffing on the quality and cost of patient care.
Pratt R; Burr G; Leelarthaepin B; Blizard P; Walsh S
Aust J Adv Nurs; 1993; 10(3):27-39. PubMed ID: 8240762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. JCAHO nursing standards. Nursing care hours and LOS per DRG--Part II.
Trofino J
Nurs Manage; 1989 Jan; 20(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 2491918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Magnet hospitals talk about the impact of DRGs on nursing care--Part II.
Kramer M; Schmalenberg C
Nurs Manage; 1987 Oct; 18(10):33-6, 38-40. PubMed ID: 3118278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The 12-hour shift: 'it's good for nurses, but is it good for the patients?'.
Bajnok I
Hosp Adm Can; 1975 Oct; 17(10):25-6. PubMed ID: 10241798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Interviews: quality of nursing care and its determinants.
Cam RS
Philipp J Nurs; 1981; 51(2):44-7. PubMed ID: 6915577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Implementing a DRG-driven acuity system for nurse staffing under prospective hospital payment.
Caterinicchio RP
Hosp Top; 1985; 63(3):6-7, 13. PubMed ID: 10311121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Nursing: gearing up for DRGs. Part II: Management strategies.
Shaffer FA
Nurs Health Care; 1984 Feb; 5(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 6422351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Building a classification system that works.
Unger J
J Nurs Adm; 1985; 15(7-8):18-24. PubMed ID: 3926964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In praise of overlap.
Castledine G
Nurs Times; 1985 Nov 13-19; 81(46):23. PubMed ID: 3853138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [A critical discussion on the scheduling arrangement of nursing personnel. 2].
Wiltsche M
Osterr Krankenpflegez; 1982; 35(11):267-73. PubMed ID: 6925752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Computers. FIP for its purpose.
Morgan C; Cutts S; Shaw D
Nurs Times; 1990 May 30-Jun 5; 86(22):70. PubMed ID: 2352878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. A debate: RIMs & the cost of nursing care.
Caterinicchio RP; Grimaldi PL; Micheletti JA
Nurs Manage; 1983 May; 14(5):36-41. PubMed ID: 6405332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]