These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 642554)

  • 1. Hemodynamic assessment of Lillehei-Kaster tilting disc aortic and mitral prostheses.
    Forman R; Gersh BJ; Fraser R; Beck W
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978 Apr; 75(4):595-8. PubMed ID: 642554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemodynamic evaluation of the Lillehei-Kaster pivoting disc valve in patients.
    Starek PJ; Wilcox BR; Murray GF
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1976 Jan; 71(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 1249948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses].
    Minardi G; Di Segni M; Boccardi L; Ferrari O; Giovannini E
    G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3410201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The Bjoerk-Shiley and the Lillehei-Kaster valve in aortal position. A hemodynamic comparison].
    Diggelmann UP; Krayenbühl HP; Rothlin M; Senning A
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1978 Jan; 108(3):92-7. PubMed ID: 622538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The Lillehei-Kaster valve prosthesis hemodynamic and mechanic features in vivo (author's transl)].
    Sigwart U; Gleichmann U; Schmidt H; Borst HG
    Thoraxchir Vask Chir; 1976 Oct; 24(5):397-400. PubMed ID: 1086529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical experience with the Lillehei-Kaster cardiac valve prosthesis.
    Mitha AS; Matisonn RE; le Roux BT; Chesler E
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1976 Sep; 72(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 785108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Hemodynamic comparison of Starr-Edwards, Lillehei-Kaster and homograft valves in the mitral position (author's transl)].
    Huhmann W; Lichtlen PR; Rickards AF; Yacoub M; Borst HG
    Z Kardiol; 1978 Oct; 67(10):667-71. PubMed ID: 735282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Current status of the Beall, Bjork-Shiley, Braunwald-Cutter, Lillehei-Kaster and Smeloff-Cutter cardiac valve prostheses.
    Brawley RK; Donahoo JS; Gott VL
    Am J Cardiol; 1975 Jun; 35(6):855-65. PubMed ID: 124127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aortic valve replacement. A randomized study comparing the Björk-Shiley and Lillehei-Kaster disc valves. Peroperative haemodynamic evaluation and early results.
    Levang OW
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978; 12(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 725560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Hemodynamics after mitral valve replacement with Starr-Edwards, Björk-Shiley and Lillehei-Kaster protheses (author's transl)].
    Haerten K; Both A; Lück J; Herzer J; Loogen F
    Z Kardiol; 1977 May; 66(5):242-6. PubMed ID: 878552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of intraoperative flow measurements and haemodynamic findings at follow-up in patients with different aortic disc valve prostheses.
    Nitter-Hauge S; Levang OW; Semb BK
    Life Support Syst; 1983; 1(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 6679012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Primary results with the new Hall-Kaster disc valve prosthesis in mitral position.
    Nitter-Hauge S; Semb BK; Levorstad K; Rostad H; Hall KV
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979 Apr; 27(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 451984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Lillehei-Kaster aortic valve prosthesis. Long-term results in 273 patients with 1253 patient-years of follow-up.
    Stewart S; Cianciotta D; Hicks GL; DeWeese JA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Jun; 95(6):1023-30. PubMed ID: 3259656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemodynamic performance of the Ionescu-Shiley valve prosthesis.
    Becker RM; Strom J; Frishman W; Oka Y; Lin YT; Yellin EL; Frater RW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Oct; 80(4):613-20. PubMed ID: 7421295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
    Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of various mechanical heart values in the mitral and aortic positions.
    Iwahashi K; Ota T; Okada M; Tsukube T; Matsuda H
    Kobe J Med Sci; 1993 Jun; 39(3):81-93. PubMed ID: 8255076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Doppler echocardiography evaluation of the hemodynamic performance of the Lillehei-Kaster and Medtronic Hall valves in aortic position].
    Kirzner CF; Campos Filho O; Buffolo E
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 1993 Nov; 61(5):265-72. PubMed ID: 8147722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Central hemodynamics at rest and during exercise after mitral valve replacement with different prostheses.
    Horstkotte D; Haerten K; Seipel L; Körfer R; Budde T; Bircks W; Loogen F
    Circulation; 1983 Sep; 68(3 Pt 2):II161-8. PubMed ID: 6872188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparative study of mechanical heart valves for implantation in mitral position].
    Heiliger R; Lambertz H; Geks J; Mittermayer C
    Herz; 1987 Dec; 12(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 3428845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.
    Haaf P; Steiner M; Attmann T; Pfister G; Cremer J; Lutter G
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 57(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19169990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.