These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6429330)
1. Assessment of sutures for use in colonic surgery: an experimental study. Durdey P; Bucknall TE J R Soc Med; 1984 Jun; 77(6):472-7. PubMed ID: 6429330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal suture materials for contaminated gastrointestinal surgery: does infection influence the decrease of the tensile strength of sutures? Tanaka Y; Sadahiro S; Ishikawa K; Suzuki T; Kamijo A; Tazume S; Yasuda M Surg Today; 2012 Dec; 42(12):1170-5. PubMed ID: 22218873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of polydioxanone (PDS) and polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) in colonic anastomoses in rats. Andersen E; Søndenaa K; Holter J Int J Colorectal Dis; 1989 Dec; 4(4):251-4. PubMed ID: 2515237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical and handling properties of braided polyblend polyethylene sutures in comparison to braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures. Wüst DM; Meyer DC; Favre P; Gerber C Arthroscopy; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1146-53. PubMed ID: 17084288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abdominal wound closure. A comparison of polydioxanone, polypropylene, and Teflon-coated braided Dacron sutures. Kon ND; Meredith JW; Poole GV; Martin MB; Kawamoto E; Myers RT Am Surg; 1984 Oct; 50(10):549-51. PubMed ID: 6237599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo and in vitro degradation of monofilament absorbable sutures, PDS and Maxon. Metz SA; Chegini N; Masterson BJ Biomaterials; 1990 Jan; 11(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2105750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the tensile strengths of four monofilament absorbable suture materials after immersion in canine urine with or without bacteria. Greenberg CB; Davidson EB; Bellmer DD; Morton RJ; Payton ME Am J Vet Res; 2004 Jun; 65(6):847-53. PubMed ID: 15198227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Duration of wound healing and tissue resistance as important criteria for selecting suture materials in colon surgery]. Lünstedt B; Debus S Chirurg; 1990 Oct; 61(10):717-9. PubMed ID: 2276302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polydioxanone in digestive surgery. An experimental study. Houdart R; Lavergne A; Valleur P; Hautefeuille P Am J Surg; 1986 Sep; 152(3):268-71. PubMed ID: 2944404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Strength retention of chromic gut and synthetic absorbable sutures in a nonhealing synovial wound. Walton M Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Jun; (267):294-8. PubMed ID: 1904335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PDS (polydioxanone suture): a new synthetic absorbable suture in cataract surgery. A preliminary study. Bartholomew RS Ophthalmologica; 1981; 183(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 6795557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polydioxanone (PDS), a novel monofilament synthetic absorbable suture. Ray JA; Doddi N; Regula D; Williams JA; Melveger A Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Oct; 153(4):497-507. PubMed ID: 6792722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of new monofilament absorbable sutures on the healing of musculoaponeurotic incisions, gastrotomies, and colonic anastomoses. Foresman PA; Edlich RF; Rodeheaver GT Arch Surg; 1989 Jun; 124(6):708-10. PubMed ID: 2525019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preclinical evaluation of PDS (polydioxanone) synthetic absorbable suture vs chromic surgical gut in urologic surgery. Cohen EL; Kirschenbaum A; Glenn JF Urology; 1987 Oct; 30(4):369-72. PubMed ID: 3116740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Studies on the efficacy and safety of polydioxanone monofilament absorbable suture. Lerwick E Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1983 Jan; 156(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 6401197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Tendon sutures with a new monofilament synthetic absorbable suture material (PDS-suture of 6-0 strength). Results of animal experiments]. Albers W; Geldmacher J; Giedl H; Beyer W Chirurg; 1982 Mar; 53(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 6802585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental studies with absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures in infected canine arterial anastomoses. Torsello GB; Sandmann W; Lenz W; Rosin H J Vasc Surg; 1986 Jan; 3(1):135-9. PubMed ID: 3079839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Behaviour of synthetic absorbable sutures with and without synergistic enteric infection. Kapadia CR; Mann JB; McGeehan D; Jose Biglin JE; Waxman BP; Dudley HA Eur Surg Res; 1983; 15(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 6303792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS. Bourne RB; Bitar H; Andreae PR; Martin LM; Finlay JB; Marquis F Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats. Sanz LE; Patterson JA; Kamath R; Willett G; Ahmed SW; Butterfield AB Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]