73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6429609)
1. [Antibiotic sensitivity test. Comparative multicenter study of the gel diffusion and ATB methods].
Gayral JP; Cluzel R; Miermont C; Pons M; Bismuth R; Bazire B; Lagrange P; Paul G; Duval J; Soussy CJ
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1984 May; 32(5):347-50. PubMed ID: 6429609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of a new rapid antibiogram method, the Rapid-ATB system. Comparison with the agar dilution reference method and the standard antibiogram].
Le Noc P; Gayral JP; Robert J
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1985 Nov; 33(9):906-10. PubMed ID: 3936008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of the antibiotic sensitivity of Pseudomonas sp. using the API-ATB-PSE system. Comparison with diffusion and the reference agar dilution method].
Delisle F; Lesage D; Gayral JP; Daguet GL; Vergez P; Le Cunff D
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1986 May; 34(5):424-9. PubMed ID: 3534715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Evaluation of the sensitivity of Haemophilus to antibiotics by the modified API-ATB system].
Bourlioux P; Rosenau A; Perdiz M
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1985 Jun; 33(5 Pt 2):557-63. PubMed ID: 3911154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of the Rapid-ATB system for testing the sensitivity of staphylococci to antibiotics. Comparison with the agar dilution reference method].
Le Noc P; Carret G; Couix C; Flandrois JP; Gayral JP; Robert J
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1986 Jun; 34(5 Pt 2):600-3. PubMed ID: 3534751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparative multicenter study of 2 methods of determining sensitivity to antibiotics. Gel diffusion method and semiautomatic method in fluid ABAC medium].
Brun Y; Chanal M; Durosoir JL; Schott P; Sirot D; Saliou P; Coulet M; Thabaut A; Cluzel R; Fleurette J
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1984 Jan; 32(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 6422428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of the ATB system and the 32 GN tests for the identification and determination of the antibiotic sensitivity of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus var. anitratum. Comparison with the reference dilution method in a gel medium].
Joly-Guillou ML; Bergogne-Berezin E; Gayral JP; Dronne N
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1987 May; 35(5):563-7. PubMed ID: 3302861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of a new automated system for the determination of antifungal sensitivity].
Lozano MC; Parras P; Martín E
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1993 Mar; 11(3):135-8. PubMed ID: 8499512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of 2 rapid systems for evaluating the sensitivity to antibiotics of 170 strains of Enterobacteriaceae: the Rapid ATB and the Autobac].
Enoch F; Freney J; Combe P; Nervi C; Fleurette J
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1986; 44(5):501-4. PubMed ID: 3813135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of antimicrobial susceptibilities of clinically isolated anaerobic bacteria by E-test, ATB-ANA and agar dilution.
Koru O; Ozyurt M
Anaerobe; 2008 Jun; 14(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 18424192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of several methods for detection of methicillin resistance in clinical strains of Staphylococcus sp].
Rokosz A; Sawicka-Grzelak A; Meisel-Mikołajczyk F
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 1997; 49(1-2):19-25. PubMed ID: 9411068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the disc diffusion method with a comparison study for fluconazole susceptibility of Candida strains.
Kustimur S; Kalkanci A; Mansuroglu H; Senel K
Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 Apr; 116(4):633-6. PubMed ID: 12875738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Determination of methicillin resistance in clinical strains of Staphylococcus aureus in routine microbiological diagnostics].
Słomka M; Szymanowska A; Rokosz A; Sawicka-Grzelak A; Luczak M
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2004; 56(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 15544083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of the results of in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing using the Fungitest kit and the disc diffusion test].
Buchta V; Navrátilová L; Förstl M; Kubanová P
Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek; 2004 Apr; 10(2):80-7. PubMed ID: 15146386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Reliability of the bacterial identification tests and of antibiotic sensitivity tests made with automatic methods].
Goffi M; Somenzi P; Magliani W; Menozzi MG
Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1981 Mar; 17(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 7313071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori to metronidazole.
Perna F; Gatta L; Figura N; Ricci C; Tampieri A; Holton J; Miglioli M; Vaira D
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Oct; 98(10):2157-61. PubMed ID: 14572561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Susceptibility of Candida species to fluconazole assayed by a disk diffusion method with automated reading versus a microdilution method.
Finquelievich JL; Iovannitti CA; Mujica MT; Relloso S; Carnovale S; de Elías Costa MR; Jewtuchowicz V; Espinel-Ingroff A
Rev Argent Microbiol; 2003; 35(4):214-8. PubMed ID: 14976874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of antimicrobial susceptibility among invasive isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae: comparison of the Etest with the standard agar dilution method.
Fitzgerald MA; Parkinson AJ
Alaska Med; 1997; 39(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 9112789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of susceptibility test methods to detect penicillin susceptibility in Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates.
Mohd Nasir MD; Parasakthi N
Malays J Pathol; 2004 Jun; 26(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 16190104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study of the disc diffusion method with the broth microdilution and Etest methods for voriconazole susceptibility testing of Aspergillus spp.
Serrano MC; Ramírez M; Morilla D; Valverde A; Chávez M; Espinel-Ingroff A; Claro R; Fernández A; Almeida C; Martín-Mazuelos E
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2004 May; 53(5):739-42. PubMed ID: 15056643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
