125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6429790)
1. [Complex evaluation of film mammographic imaging systems. 2. Comparison of 18 systems using a signal-noise matrix].
Friedrich M; Weskamp P
Rofo; 1984 Jun; 140(6):707-16. PubMed ID: 6429790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Film quality in film mammography. Article II: Signal/noise ratio of the recording system as a quantitative measure of quality. Final evaluation of recording systems (author's transl)].
Friedrich M; Weskamp P
Rofo; 1976 Nov; 125(5):461-71. PubMed ID: 137194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
Haus AG
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of film-screen combinations in contrast-detail diagram and with interactive image analysis. 3: Trimodal histograms of gray scale distribution in bar groups of lead pattern images].
Hagemann G; Eichbaum G; Stamm G
Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 May; 8(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 9645256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Complex evaluation of film mammography imaging systems. I. Methodological principles].
Friedrich M; Weskamp P
Rofo; 1984 May; 140(5):585-96. PubMed ID: 6429765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The reduction of radiation burden in mammography using film-screen combination systems].
Waegner U; Geissler S; Rosenkranz G
Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990; 31(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 2277840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system.
Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Examinations of rare-earth film-screen-systems for image detectors in mammography (author's transl)].
Weberling R
Rontgenblatter; 1979 Mar; 32(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 432483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
Friedrich MA
Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [New intensifying screens in clinical radiology III: Screen-film combinations in mammography (author's transl)].
Hagemann G; Knedel H; Weberling R
Rofo; 1978 Aug; 129(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 151029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison of film-screen combinations with contrast detail diagram and interactive image analysis. 2: Linear assessment of grey scale ranges with interactive image analysis].
Stamm G; Eichbaum G; Hagemann G
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Sep; 7(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 9410005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of the quality of screen-film radiographic systems: physical principles and methods of measurement].
Borasi G; Berardi P; Ferretti PP; Piccagli V
Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 2236696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of radiographic screen-film systems: a comparison between the use of a microdensitometer and a drum film digitiser.
Verdun FR; Pachoud M; Bergmann D; Buhr E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15933110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of film-screen combination in a contrast detail diagram and with interactive image analysis. 1: Contrast detail diagram].
Hagemann G; Eichbaum G
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Jul; 7(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 9340021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The use of the Daylight System in mammography].
Giuseppetti G; Maggi S; Ercolani P; Procaccini G; Amici F
Radiol Med; 1989; 78(1-2):107-11. PubMed ID: 2781054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems.
Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Use of the ROC method in problems of image quality and quality control in mammography].
Wurm J; Säbel M; Weishaar J
Rofo; 1982 Aug; 137(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 6215307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Experimental study on image quality when using screens in mammography (author's transl)].
Maurer HJ; Goos F
Rofo; 1979 Mar; 130(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 155580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
