These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Contrast agents: a review of 'low osmolarity' media. Dawson P Radiography; 1984; 50(592):142-5. PubMed ID: 6463218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The responsibility of contrast media companies in the costs and benefits of radiology: giving the radiologist a real choice. Idée AS; Bonnemain B; Briand YP Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S157-9. PubMed ID: 8796550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. High or low osmolar contrast media? Hale M Clin Radiol; 1991 Jun; 43(6):435-6. PubMed ID: 2070594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost of preventing adverse reactions to low-osmolar contrast agents. Millward SF Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):871-2. PubMed ID: 8184084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reactions to contrast media. Goldman M; Eyes B Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1988 Apr; 296(6630):1193-4. PubMed ID: 3132257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The clinical and financial implications of the low-osmolar radiological contrast media: further correspondence. Bye P Clin Radiol; 1984 Sep; 35(5):422-3. PubMed ID: 6467833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of major adverse renal cardiovascular event (MARCE) incidence, procedure volume, and unit cost on the hospital savings resulting from contrast media use in inpatient angioplasty. Keuffel E; McCullough PA; Todoran TM; Brilakis ES; Palli SR; Ryan MP; Gunnarsson C J Med Econ; 2018 Apr; 21(4):356-364. PubMed ID: 29226736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonionic vs ionic contrast media: what do the data tell us? Lasser EC; Berry CC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May; 152(5):945-6. PubMed ID: 2650493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Malpractice, informed consent, and the use of low osmolality contrast media. Eisner JM; Casey BJ Conn Med; 1988 Feb; 52(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 3278846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]