108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6431890)
1. Electrically induced auditory brainstem response as a clinical tool in estimating nerve survival.
Simmons FB; Lusted HS; Meyers T; Shelton C
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984; 112():97-100. PubMed ID: 6431890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Estimation of surviving auditory nerve by electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (FABR)--comparison between extra-cochlear stimulation and intra-cochlear stimulation].
Hatsushika S; Funasaka S
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1989 Jul; 92(7):1005-11. PubMed ID: 2809867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physiologic measures of electrically evoked auditory system responsiveness: effects of pathology and electrical stimulation.
Miller JM
Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():28-36; discussion 43-7. PubMed ID: 2069186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Deafened kittens.
Shepherd RK; Matsushima J; Martin RL; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):150-66. PubMed ID: 7737922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Physiological and histopathological results.
Shepherd RK; Clark GM; Black RC
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1983; 399():19-31. PubMed ID: 6316712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of site of stimulation on the guinea pig's electrically evoked brain stem response.
Marsh RR; Yamane H; Potsic WP
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1981; 89(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 6784070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of electrode sites in electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
Lusted HS; Shelton C; Simmons FB
Laryngoscope; 1984 Jul; 94(7):878-82. PubMed ID: 6738264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Middle-latency responses. II. Variation among stimulation sites.
Burton MJ; Miller JM; Kileny PR
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1989 Apr; 115(4):458-61. PubMed ID: 2923689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) in cats and humans.
van den Honert C; Stypulkowski PH
Hear Res; 1986; 21(2):109-26. PubMed ID: 3754550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I: Normal hearing kittens.
Ni D; Shepherd RK; Seldon HL; Xu SA; Clark GM; Millard RE
Hear Res; 1992 Sep; 62(1):63-81. PubMed ID: 1429252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating eighth nerve survival by electrical stimulation.
Smith L; Simmons FB
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1983; 92(1 Pt 1):19-23. PubMed ID: 6824273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Brainstem histopathology following chronic scala tympani implantation in monkeys.
Miller JM; Sutton D; Webster DB
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1980; 89(2 Pt 2):15-7. PubMed ID: 6769376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig.
Mitchell A; Miller JM; Finger PA; Heller JW; Raphael Y; Altschuler RA
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):30-43. PubMed ID: 9083802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chronic electrical stimulation of auditory nerve in cat: Physiological and histological results.
Walsh SM; Leake-Jones PA
Hear Res; 1982 Aug; 7(3):281-304. PubMed ID: 7118732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response.
Hall RD
Hear Res; 1990 Apr; 45(1-2):123-36. PubMed ID: 2345111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does electrical stimulation of deaf cochleae prevent spiral ganglion degeneration?
Li L; Parkins CW; Webster DB
Hear Res; 1999 Jul; 133(1-2):27-39. PubMed ID: 10416862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Delayed electrical stimulation and BDNF application following induced deafness in rats.
Song BN; Li YX; Han DM
Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Feb; 129(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 18607918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cochleotopic selectivity of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array using the 2-deoxyglucose technique.
Brown M; Shepherd RK; Webster WR; Martin RL; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1992 May; 59(2):224-40. PubMed ID: 1618713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
