These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6432124)

  • 1. Age-sex registers as a screening tool for general practice: size of the wrong address problem.
    Silman AJ
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Aug; 289(6442):415-6. PubMed ID: 6432124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age-sex registers as a screening tool for general practice: size of the wrong address problem.
    Fraser RC
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Oct; 289(6449):923-4. PubMed ID: 6434145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do most practices have an age-sex register? Results of the West Midlands age-sex register study.
    Cooper RF
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Nov; 291(6506):1391-3. PubMed ID: 3933682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical screening in an inner city area: response to a call system in general practice.
    Shroff KJ; Corrigan AM; Bosher M; Edmonds MP; Sacks D; Coleman DV
    BMJ; 1988 Nov; 297(6659):1317-8. PubMed ID: 3144375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surveys using general practice registers: who are the non-responders?
    Pope D; Croft P
    J Public Health Med; 1996 Mar; 18(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 8785078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accuracy of age-sex registers, practice medical records and family practitioner committee registers.
    Fraser RC; Clayton DG
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1981 Jul; 31(228):410-9. PubMed ID: 7320986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the cervical cytology screening programme in an inner city health district.
    Beardow R; Oerton J; Victor C
    BMJ; 1989 Jul; 299(6691):98-100. PubMed ID: 2504348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Problems of cervical cancer screening programmes.
    Rang EH; Tod ED
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1988 Jun; 38(311):267-9. PubMed ID: 3255814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attendance and non-attendance for breast screening at the south east London breast screening service.
    McEwen J; King E; Bickler G
    BMJ; 1989 Jul; 299(6691):104-6. PubMed ID: 2504314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the use of general practice age-sex registers in epidemiological research.
    Walsh K
    Br J Gen Pract; 1994 Mar; 44(380):118-22. PubMed ID: 8204319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do general practitioners influence the uptake of breast cancer screening?
    Majeed FA; Cook DG; Given-Wilson R; Vecchi P; Poloniecki J
    J Med Screen; 1995; 2(3):119-24. PubMed ID: 8536178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of age-sex registers in general practice.
    Sheldon MG; Rector AL; Barnes PA
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1984 May; 34(262):269-71. PubMed ID: 6737364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of electoral registers and Family Practitioner Committee lists for population studies of the very elderly.
    Bowling A; Hart D; Silman A
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1989 Dec; 43(4):391-4. PubMed ID: 2614332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in medicare beneficiaries.
    Schermerhorn M; Zwolak R; Velazquez O; Makaroun M; Fairman R; Cronenwett J
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2008 Jan; 22(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 18055170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Continuous opportunistic and systematic screening for hypertension with computer help: analysis of non-responders.
    Difford F; Telling JP; Davies KR; Fornear JE; Reading CA
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 May; 294(6580):1130-2. PubMed ID: 3107726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Colour tagging of medical records and age-sex cards.
    Nightingale JH; Walton RJ
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1985 Nov; 35(280):520-1. PubMed ID: 4078806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computerised age/sex registers.
    Kljakovic M; Moodie PJ
    N Z Med J; 1993 May; 106(955):186-7. PubMed ID: 8502450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary results of a general practice based call system for cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands.
    Palm BT; Kant AC; van den Bosch WJ; Vooijs GP; van Weel C
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Dec; 43(377):503-6. PubMed ID: 8312021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preliminary results of a district call scheme for cervical screening organised in general practice.
    Havelock CM; Webb J; Queenborough J
    BMJ; 1988 Nov; 297(6660):1384-6. PubMed ID: 3146374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Matched controls in surveys of the use of general practice. Another use for research practice age-sex registers.
    Russell I
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1975 Nov; 25(160):801-10. PubMed ID: 1223270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.