111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6434921)
1. The implementation of the AAPM Task Group 21 protocol by the Radiological Physics Center and its implications.
Gastorf RJ; Hanson WF; Shalek RJ; Berkley LW
Med Phys; 1984; 11(4):547-51. PubMed ID: 6434921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
Tailor RC; Hanson WF
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the AAPM "Protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams" with currently used protocols.
Hunt MA; Malik S; Thomason C; Masterson ME
Med Phys; 1984; 11(6):806-13. PubMed ID: 6439991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. TG-51: experience from 150 institutions, common errors, and helpful hints.
Tailor RC; Hanson WF; Ibbott GS
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(2):102-11. PubMed ID: 12777144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.
Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
Araki F; Kubo HD
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of IAEA 1987 and AAPM 1983 protocols for dosimetry calibration of radiotherapy beams.
Huq MS; Nath R
Med Phys; 1991; 18(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 1901129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams for radiotherapy using AAPM 1983 and IAEA 1987 dosimetry protocols.
Huq MS; Agostinelli AG; Nath R
Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):293-8. PubMed ID: 8497213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A round-robin gamma stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry interinstitution comparison of calibration protocols.
Drzymala RE; Alvarez PE; Bednarz G; Bourland JD; DeWerd LA; Ma L; Meltsner SG; Neyman G; Novotny J; Petti PL; Rivard MJ; Shiu AS; Goetsch SJ
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6745-56. PubMed ID: 26520764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. AAPM Task Group 21 protocol: dosimetric evaluation.
Paul JM; Koch RF; Philip PC
Med Phys; 1985; 12(4):424-30. PubMed ID: 3929049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. TG-21 versus TG-25: a comparison for electrons.
Followill DS; Davis DS; Hanson WF
Med Phys; 1997 Jul; 24(7):1117-21. PubMed ID: 9243474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The calibration and use of plane-parallel ionization chambers for dosimetry of electron beams: an extension of the 1983 AAPM protocol report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 39.
Almond PR; Attix FH; Humphries LJ; Kubo H; Nath R; Goetsch S; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1994 Aug; 21(8):1251-60. PubMed ID: 7799867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between TG-51 and TG-21: Calibration of photon and electron beams in water using cylindrical chambers.
Cho SH; Lowenstein JR; Balter PA; Wells NH; Hanson WF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2000; 1(3):108-15. PubMed ID: 11674825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comment on clinical implementation of the AAPM's Task Group-51 protocol for calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Rodgers JE; Niroomand-Rad A; Lundsten M
Med Phys; 2000 Aug; 27(8):1995-6. PubMed ID: 10984245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Implications of adopting the AAPM TG-21 calibration protocol for very high energy photon and electron beams.
Zwicker RD; Wu A; Sternick ES
Med Phys; 1984; 11(4):561-4. PubMed ID: 6434922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams.
Med Phys; 1983; 10(6):741-71. PubMed ID: 6419029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A review of the reliability of chamber factors used clinically in the United States (1968--1976).
Hanson WF; Grant W; Kennedy P; Cundiff JH; Gagnon WF; Berkley LW; Shalek RJ
Med Phys; 1978; 5(6):552-5. PubMed ID: 104138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences in electron beam dosimetry using two commercial ionization chambers and the TG-21 protocol: another reason to switch to TG-51.
Followill DS; Hanson WF; Ibbott GS; Eglezopoulos LR; Chui CS
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 12777147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
