These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6435293)

  • 21. Transfusion problems in renal allograft recipients. Anti-lymphocyte globulin showing Lutheran system specificity.
    Anderson HJ; Aubuchon JP; Draper EK; Ballas SK
    Transfusion; 1985; 25(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 3881847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The molecular basis of the LU:7 and LU:-7 phenotypes.
    Hue-Roye K; Reid ME
    Immunohematology; 2012; 28(4):130-1. PubMed ID: 23421542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Two kindred with the rare dominant inhibitor of the lutheran and p1 red cell antigens.
    Gibson T
    Hum Hered; 1976; 26(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 955641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A novel 519_525dup mutation of KLF1 gene identified in a Chinese blood donor with Lu(a-b-) phenotype.
    Wang Z; Luo G; Ji Y
    Transfusion; 2013 Jul; 53(7):1619-20. PubMed ID: 23844643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A family demonstrating the independence between Lutheran and Auberger loci.
    Salmon C; Rouger P; Liberge G; Streiff F
    Rev Fr Transfus Immunohematol; 1981 Jun; 24(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 7280453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lutheran.
    Daniels G
    Immunohematology; 2009; 25(4):152-9. PubMed ID: 20406022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An insertion/deletion polymorphism in the KLF1 gene resulting in an In(Lu) phenotype.
    Floch A; Vege S; Burgos A; Kuchma S; Bell M; Lomas-Francis C; Westhoff CM
    Transfusion; 2021 Oct; 61(10):E73-E74. PubMed ID: 34487547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. New abnormalities in the morphology, cell surface receptors, and electrolyte metabolism of In(Lu) erythrocytes.
    Udden MM; Umeda M; Hirano Y; Marcus DM
    Blood; 1987 Jan; 69(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 3790728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evidence that SE is distal to LU on chromosome 19q.
    Zelinski T; Coghlan G; Greenberg CR; McAlpine PJ; Lewis M
    Transfusion; 1989 May; 29(4):304-5. PubMed ID: 2718232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Immunological specificities of four Lutheran related monoclonal antibodies.
    Rouger P; Liberge G; Gane P; Salmon C
    Rev Fr Transfus Immunohematol; 1988 Apr; 31(2):441-6. PubMed ID: 3212327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evidence that the Lub blood group antigen is located on red cell membrane glycoproteins of 85 and 78 kd.
    Parsons SF; Mallinson G; Judson PA; Anstee DJ; Tanner MJ; Daniels GL
    Transfusion; 1987; 27(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 3810828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. No quantitative relationship between CR1 and Lutheran expression on erythrocytes: In(Lu) gene product is not a common regulator of CR1 expression on erythrocytes.
    Oudin S; Lepennec PY; Dervillez X; Tonye-Libyh M; Tabary T; Philbert F; Bougy F; Reveil B; Pennaforte JL; Rouger P; Cohen JH
    Exp Clin Immunogenet; 1999; 16(2):72-80. PubMed ID: 10343158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Human red cell antigens. V. Expression of In(Lu)-related p80 antigens by recessive-type Lu(a-b-) red cells.
    Telen MJ; Green AM
    Transfusion; 1988; 28(5):430-4. PubMed ID: 3420670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prokaryotic versus eukaryotic recombinant Lutheran blood group protein for antibody identification.
    Seltsam A; GrĂ¼ger D; Blasczyk R
    Transfusion; 2007 Sep; 47(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 17725727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Two novel mutations in KLF1 were identified in Chinese individuals with In(Lu) phenotype.
    Chen S; Hong X; Xu X; He J; Zhu F
    Transfusion; 2018 Jan; 58(1):271-272. PubMed ID: 29193102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Novel mutations in KLF1 encoding the In(Lu) phenotype reflect a diversity of clinical presentations.
    Keller J; Vege S; Horn T; Keller MA; Leger RM; Aeschlimann J; Lomas-Francis C; Westhoff CM
    Transfusion; 2018 Jan; 58(1):196-199. PubMed ID: 29047116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The alloantibody response in the allogeneically pregnant rat. IV. Analysis of the alloantibody specificities with monoclonal antibodies.
    Smith RN; Amsden A; Sudilovsky O; Coleman N; Margolies R
    J Immunol; 1986 Jun; 136(11):4063-9. PubMed ID: 3084652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Test results of four monoclonal antibodies against markers of the Lutheran system.
    Okubo Y; Seno T; Yamano H; Yamaguchi H
    Rev Fr Transfus Immunohematol; 1988 Apr; 31(2):463-6. PubMed ID: 3212329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A regional localisation for an X-linked suppressor gene (XS) for the Lutheran blood group.
    Mulley JC; Norman PC; Tippett P; Beal RW
    Hum Genet; 1988 Feb; 78(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 3422213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro storage and in vivo survival studies of red cells from persons with the In(Lu) gene.
    Ballas SK; Marcolina MJ; Crawford MN
    Transfusion; 1992 Sep; 32(7):607-11. PubMed ID: 1519324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.