These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6435993)

  • 1. [Objective gustometry with adequate stimulation by registration of contingent negative variation].
    Gerull G; Mrowinski D; Schilling V
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1984 Sep; 15(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 6435993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Basis and clinical application of the "contingent negative variation" in "evoked response audiometry" (author's transl)].
    Brix R
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1975 Jan; 87(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 1130075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Olfactory stimulation and contingent negative variation (CNV) (author's transl)].
    Gerull G; Mielke G; Mrowinski D
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1981 Sep; 12(3):125-7. PubMed ID: 6795016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Clinical gustometry].
    Nejadnik B
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1992; 46(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 1566624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Research of the chorda tympani nerve in cholesteatoma].
    Hu Z; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Apr; 36(2):123-5. PubMed ID: 12761979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Task related changes in contingent negative variation (CNV) response of endogenous evoked potentials.
    Sahai V; Tandon OP
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2000 Jul; 44(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 10941619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Olfactory evoked potentials and contingent negative variation simultaneously recorded for diagnosis of smell disorders.
    Auffermann H; Gerull G; Mathe F; Mrowinski D
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1993 Jan; 102(1 Pt 1):6-10. PubMed ID: 8420471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of sweet suppressing agent on gustatory brain evoked potentials generated by taste stimuli.
    Min BC; Sakamoto K
    Appl Human Sci; 1998 Jan; 17(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 9575639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peripheral gustatory processing of sweet stimuli by golden hamsters.
    Frank ME; Formaker BK; Hettinger TP
    Brain Res Bull; 2005 Jul; 66(1):70-84. PubMed ID: 15925146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of response type (motor output versus mental counting) on the intracerebral distribution of the slow cortical potentials in an externally cued (CNV) paradigm.
    Bares M; Nestrasil I; Rektor I
    Brain Res Bull; 2007 Jan; 71(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 17208661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Gustatory perceptions in children].
    Nicklaus S; Boggio V; Issanchou S
    Arch Pediatr; 2005 May; 12(5):579-84. PubMed ID: 15885551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Slow cortical potential shifts preceding sensorimotor interactions.
    Babiloni C; Brancucci A; Capotosto P; Romani GL; Arendt-Nielsen L; Chen AC; Rossini PM
    Brain Res Bull; 2005 Apr; 65(4):309-16. PubMed ID: 15811596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Methodological aspects of the analysis of the effects of drugs (diazepam and caffeine) on contingent negative variation].
    Heinze HJ; Münte TF; Künkel H; Dickmann K
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1985 Jun; 16(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 3930214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brain activity during interval timing depends on sensory structure.
    Pfeuty M; Ragot R; Pouthas V
    Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 1204():112-7. PubMed ID: 18336798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Contingent negative variation (CNV) and neurophysiology].
    Bergamasco B; Benna P; Covacich A; Gilli M
    Riv Neurol; 1978; 48(1):92-104. PubMed ID: 349669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Methods of taste sensitivity examination].
    Klimacka-Nawrot E; Suchecka W
    Wiad Lek; 2008; 61(7-9):207-10. PubMed ID: 19172833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Elucidating coding of taste qualities with the taste modifier miraculin in the common marmoset.
    Danilova V; Hellekant G
    Brain Res Bull; 2006 Jan; 68(5):315-21. PubMed ID: 16377437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gustatory stimulation influences the processing of intranasal stimuli.
    Welge-Lüssen A; Drago J; Wolfensberger M; Hummel T
    Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 1038(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 15748874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cortical chronometry of electrogustatory event-related potentials.
    Ohla K; Hudry J; le Coutre J
    Brain Topogr; 2009 Sep; 22(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 19199019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of taste sensation following tongue reconstruction by microvascular forearm free flap.
    Shibahara T; Eizou T; Katakura A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 63(5):618-22. PubMed ID: 15883934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.