These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6439746)

  • 1. Mathematical modeling of fetal growth: I. Basic principles.
    Rossavik IK; Deter RL
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1984; 12(9):529-33. PubMed ID: 6439746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mathematical modeling of fetal growth: II. Head cube (A), abdominal cube (B) and their ratio (A/B).
    Rossavik IK; Deter RL
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1984; 12(9):535-45. PubMed ID: 6439747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fitting growth curves to head and abdomen measurements of the fetus: a multicentric study.
    Todros T; Ferrazzi E; Groli C; Nicolini U; Parodi L; Pavoni M; Zorzoli A; Zucca S
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1987 Feb; 15(2):95-105. PubMed ID: 3134408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mathematical modeling of fetal growth. IV. Evaluation of trunk growth using the abdominal profile area.
    Rossavik IK; Deter RL; Hadlock FP
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1987 Jan; 15(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 3106421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mathematic modeling of fetal growth: development of individual growth curve standards.
    Deter RL; Rossavik IK; Harrist RB; Hadlock FP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Aug; 68(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 3526216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mathematical modeling of fetal splenic growth: use of the Rossavik growth model.
    Hata T; Deter RL; Aoki S; Makihara K; Hata K; Kitao M
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1992 Jun; 20(5):321-7. PubMed ID: 1316374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mathematical models for fetal growth: application for biparietal diameter measurement.
    Nitzan M; Tadmor OP; Skomorowski Y; Rabinowitz R; Diamant Y
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 1994; 9(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 7818780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of fetal growth curves with mathematical modeling.
    Deter RL
    J Ultrasound Med; 1993 Nov; 12(11):639-40. PubMed ID: 8264013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of ultrasound in the assessment of normal fetal growth: a review.
    Deter RL; Harrist RB; Hadlock FP; Carpenter RJ
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1981; 9(9):481-93. PubMed ID: 6796608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Longitudinal studies of fetal growth using volume parameters determined with ultrasound.
    Deter RL; Harrist RB; Hadlock FP; Cortissoz CM; Batten GW
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1984; 12(6):313-24. PubMed ID: 6438158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal head and abdominal circumferences: effect of profile shape on the accuracy of ellipse equations.
    Shields JR; Medearis AL; Bear MB
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1987 May; 15(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 3134423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mathematical modeling of fetal growth. III. Evaluation of head growth using the head profile area.
    Rossavik IK; Deter RL; Hadlock FP
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1987 Jan; 15(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 3106419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mathematical modeling of fetal organ growth using the Rossavik growth model: II. Adrenal gland.
    Hata T; Deter RL; Nagata H; Makihara K; Hata K; Kitao M
    Am J Perinatol; 1993 Mar; 10(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 8476489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasound measurement of fetal abdominal circumference and the ratio of biparietal diameter to transverse abdominal diameter in a mixed Nigerian population.
    Okonofua FE; Ayangade SO; Ajibulu OA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 27(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 2905282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fetal abdominal circumference as a predictor of menstrual age.
    Hadlock FP; Deter RL; Harrist RB; Park SK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Aug; 139(2):367-70. PubMed ID: 6979895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Ultrasound measurement of fetal head and body sizes in the assessment of fetal growth].
    Liou SM; Satoh A
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Jul; 36(7):1034-42. PubMed ID: 6747387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longitudinal reference charts for growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur.
    Johnsen SL; Wilsgaard T; Rasmussen S; Sollien R; Kiserud T
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):172-85. PubMed ID: 16289532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of the interval between time points on individual fetal growth curve standards derived from Rossavik models and two ultrasound scans before 26 weeks, menstrual age.
    Simon NV; Deter RL; Levisky JS; Stefos T; Shearer DM
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1989 May; 17(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 2497142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of three methods of assessing inter-observer variation applied to ultrasonic fetal measurement in the third trimester.
    Sarmandal P; Bailey SM; Grant JM
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Nov; 96(11):1261-5. PubMed ID: 2692697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Longitudinal distance standards of fetal growth. Intrauterine and Infant Longitudinal Growth Study: IILGS.
    Di Battista E; Bertino E; Benso L; Fabris C; Aicardi G; Pagliano M; Bossi A; De Biasio P; Milani S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Mar; 79(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 10716296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.