These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6439991)
1. A comparison of the AAPM "Protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams" with currently used protocols. Hunt MA; Malik S; Thomason C; Masterson ME Med Phys; 1984; 11(6):806-13. PubMed ID: 6439991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies. Tailor RC; Hanson WF Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols. Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Almond PR; Biggs PJ; Coursey BM; Hanson WF; Huq MS; Nath R; Rogers DW Med Phys; 1999 Sep; 26(9):1847-70. PubMed ID: 10505874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of IAEA 1987 and AAPM 1983 protocols for dosimetry calibration of radiotherapy beams. Huq MS; Nath R Med Phys; 1991; 18(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 1901129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams for radiotherapy using AAPM 1983 and IAEA 1987 dosimetry protocols. Huq MS; Agostinelli AG; Nath R Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):293-8. PubMed ID: 8497213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols. Saiful Huq M; Andreo P Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Determination of absorbed dose to water for high energy photon and electron beams--comparison of different dosimetry protocols]. Zakaria GA; Schütte W Z Med Phys; 2003; 13(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 14732959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols. Araki F; Kubo HD Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Results of photon absorbed-dose measurements using the AAPM TG-21 protocol for accelerating potentials up to 26 MV. Hazle JD; Kirby TH; Gastorf RJ; Hanson WF Med Phys; 1991; 18(6):1234-6. PubMed ID: 1753909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols. Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The IPEM code of practice for electron dosimetry for radiotherapy beams of initial energy from 4 to 25 MeV based on an absorbed dose to water calibration. Thwaites DI; DuSautoy AR; Jordan T; McEwen MR; Nisbet A; Nahum AE; Pitchford WG; Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(18):2929-70. PubMed ID: 14529204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The implementation of the AAPM Task Group 21 protocol by the Radiological Physics Center and its implications. Gastorf RJ; Hanson WF; Shalek RJ; Berkley LW Med Phys; 1984; 11(4):547-51. PubMed ID: 6434921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The protocols and codes of practice used for the determination of absorbed dose in megavoltage photon and electron beams. Weatherburn H; Nisbet A Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1991; 19(2-3):147-80. PubMed ID: 1769240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25. Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of absorbed dose for photon and electron beams from a linear accelerator by comparing various protocols on different phantoms. Banjade DP; Tajuddin AA; Shukri A Appl Radiat Isot; 2001 Aug; 55(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 11393765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency. Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The calibration of plane parallel ionisation chambers for the measurement of absorbed dose in electron beams of low to medium energies. Part 1: the NACP chamber. Cross P; Freeman N Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Sep; 19(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 8936730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of recent codes of practice for high-energy photon dosimetry. Mijnheer BJ; Wittkämper FW Phys Med Biol; 1986 Apr; 31(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 3090570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]