These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6440226)

  • 1. [Determination of global and regional ventricular ejection fraction by a fully digitalized technic. Results of digital subtraction angiocardiography following peripheral venous contrast injection compared to cineventriculography, 2-dimensional echocardiography and radionuclide ventriculography].
    Tuengerthal S; Reifart N; Standke R; Lang J; Kollath J; Riemann HE
    Rofo; 1984 Dec; 141(6):607-16. PubMed ID: 6440226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of densitometric and morphometric measurements of global and regional functions using a fully digital subtraction unit].
    Tuengerthal S; Reifart N; Lang J
    Rofo; 1985 Apr; 142(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 2986218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction assessed by radionuclide angiocardiography, echocardiography and contrast angiocardiography.
    Albrechtsson U; Eskilsson J; Lomsky M; Stubbe I; Svensson SE; Tylén U
    Acta Med Scand; 1982 May; 211(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 7080860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Usefulness of digital subtraction left ventriculography in patients with ischemic heart disease: comparison with cineangiography.
    Paquet E; Bourassa MG; Lespérance J; Laurier J; Dyrda I; Lemarbre L; Bonan R; Joyal M; Corcos T
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Dec; 35(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 6396303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Morphometric and densitometric assessment of left ventricular function in the digital subtraction angiocardiogram].
    Franken T; Christ F; Becher H; Thurn P
    Rofo; 1985 Sep; 143(3):268-74. PubMed ID: 2996062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Videodensitometric ejection fractions from intravenous digital subtraction left ventriculograms: correlation with conventional direct contrast and radionuclide ventriculography.
    Detrano R; MacIntyre WJ; Salcedo EE; O'Donnell J; Underwood DA; Simpfendorfer C; Go RT; Jones H; Butters K; Leatherman J
    Radiology; 1985 Apr; 155(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 3883414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Left ventricle evaluation by digital video subtraction angiocardiography.
    Engels PH; Ludwig JW; Verhoeven LA
    Radiology; 1982 Aug; 144(3):471-4. PubMed ID: 7048415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitation of left ventricular dimensions and function by digital video subtraction angiography.
    Higgins CB; Norris SL; Gerber KH; Slutsky RA; Ashburn WL; Baily N
    Radiology; 1982 Aug; 144(3):461-9. PubMed ID: 7048414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Non-invasive determination of left ventricular ejection fraction using a mobile ECG-triggered scintillation measuring probe. Comparison of cineventriculography, echocardiography and radionuclide ventriculography].
    Brüggemann T; Schwietzer U; von Leitner ER; Kruck I; Koppenhagen K; Reuter E; Biamino G
    Z Kardiol; 1984 Jan; 73(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 6702250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Digital subtraction ventriculography in determining global and regional left ventricular parameters compared to left catheterization cardiography].
    Eichstädt H; Langer M; Felix R
    Radiologe; 1984 Jun; 24(6):277-85. PubMed ID: 6382430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with low-contrast dose digital subtraction ventriculography.
    Mancini GB; Hodgson JM; Legrand V; Bates ER; Aueron FM; LeFree MT; Smith JS; Beauman GJ; Vogel RA
    Chest; 1985 May; 87(5):598-602. PubMed ID: 3886314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of left ventricular function by digital subtraction angiography: effect of dose and administration mode of contrast medium, and comparison with direct ventriculography].
    Kuribayashi S; Ootaki M; Matsuyama S; Kanemoto N; Furuya H
    J Cardiogr; 1985 Sep; 15(3):575-84. PubMed ID: 3915507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of intravenous digital subtraction cineangiocardiography with conventional contrast ventriculography for the determination of the left ventricular volume at rest and during exercise.
    Birchler B; Hess OM; Murakami T; Niederer P; Anliker M; Krayenbuehl HP
    Eur Heart J; 1985 Jun; 6(6):497-509. PubMed ID: 3899652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of various background protocols on the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction in equilibrium radionuclide angiography.
    Taylor DN; Garvie NW; Harris D; Sharratt GP; Goddard BA; Ackery DM
    Br J Radiol; 1980 Mar; 53(627):205-9. PubMed ID: 7378676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exercise left ventriculography utilizing intravenous digital angiography.
    Goldberg HL; Moses JW; Borer JS; Fisher J; Tamari I; Skelly NT; Cohen B
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Dec; 2(6):1092-8. PubMed ID: 6355241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of digital and radionuclide left ventriculography in patients at risk from conventional left ventriculography.
    Lemarbre L; Paquet E; Bourassa MG; Lespérance J; Dupras G; Laurier J
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Dec; 35(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 6396304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the densitometric method of ejection fraction by direct digital subtraction left ventriculography.
    Shiba K; Nanki M; Hori H; Sakamoto N
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 May; 23(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 1863965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Digital subtraction angiocardiography: accuracy of measuring left ventricular wall thickness and wall volume during intravenous contrast media injection].
    Lauber A; Deetjen W; Jehle J; Pölitz B; Schmiel FK; Spiller P
    Z Kardiol; 1984 Apr; 73(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 6375186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Digital subtraction angiocardiography: accuracy of left ventricular volume determination using intravenous injection of contrast medium].
    Lauber A; Fischbach T; Jehle J; Pölitz B; Schmiel FK; Spiller P; Loogen F
    Z Kardiol; 1983 May; 72(5):262-7. PubMed ID: 6349159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Gated blood pool scanning in the diagnosis of coronary disease. A prospective study to compare cineventriculography and 2-dimensional echocardiography].
    Anger K; Erbel R; Krebs W; Meyer J; Möller T; Schweizer P; Yalkinoglu O
    Rofo; 1983 Nov; 139(5):487-94. PubMed ID: 6227538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.