These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 644080)

  • 1. Optimization of electrostatic imaging systems for minimum patient dose or minimum exposure in mammography.
    Muntz EP; Welkowsky M; Kaegi E; Morsell L; Wilkinson E; Jacobson G
    Radiology; 1978 May; 127(2):517-23. PubMed ID: 644080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography].
    Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2000 Nov; 172(11):940-5. PubMed ID: 11142129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Theoretical optimization of dual-energy x-ray imaging with application to mammography.
    Johns PC; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 4010633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tungsten anode tubes with K-edge filters for mammography.
    Beaman S; Lillicrap SC; Price JL
    Br J Radiol; 1983 Oct; 56(670):721-7. PubMed ID: 6616137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal photon energies with respect to absorbed dose for visualization of soft tissue masses with adipose tissue.
    Ragozzino MW
    Med Phys; 1982; 9(4):493-6. PubMed ID: 7110079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A study of mammographic exposure and detail visibility using three systems: Xerox 125, Min-R, and Xonics XERG.
    Stanton L; Villafana T; Day JL; Lightfoot DA; Stanton RE
    Radiology; 1979 Aug; 132(2):455-62. PubMed ID: 461808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The Dosage and Quality of Imaging program and quality assurance in mammography].
    Rimondi O; Gambaccini M; Marziani M; Candini GC; Indovina PL; Toti A; De Guglielmo E; Calicchia A
    Radiol Med; 1991; 81(1-2):69-72. PubMed ID: 2006340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
    Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
    Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimum photon energies for the measurement of bone mineral and fat fractions.
    Watt DE
    Br J Radiol; 1975 Apr; 48(568):265-74. PubMed ID: 1131484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A quantitative evaluation of film and film/screen combinations for mammographic examination.
    Moores BM; Hufton AP; Wrigley C; Asbury DL; Ramsden JA
    Br J Radiol; 1979 Aug; 52(620):626-33. PubMed ID: 486892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography.
    Wu X; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
    Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 2006265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
    Friedrich MA
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Radiation exposure in x-ray mammography].
    Säbel M; Aichinger U; Schulz-Wendtland R
    Rofo; 2001 Feb; 173(2):79-91. PubMed ID: 11253092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose to population as a metric in the design of optimised exposure control in digital mammography.
    Klausz R; Shramchenko N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):369-74. PubMed ID: 15933139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Value of increasing film processing time to reduce radiation dose during mammography.
    Skubic SE; Yagan R; Oravec D; Shah Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Dec; 155(6):1189-93. PubMed ID: 2122664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technologic improvements in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):628-37. PubMed ID: 2406777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study.
    Chida K; Zuguchi M; Sai M; Saito H; Yamada T; Ishibashi T; Ito D; Kimoto N; Kohzuki M; Takahashi S
    Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose reduction in mammography.
    Mintzer RA; Matthies HJ; Lin PP; Neiman HL; Rogers LF
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1978 Jan; 146(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 618496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Film mammography: new low radiation technology.
    Chang CH; Sibala JL; Martin NL; Riley RC
    Radiology; 1976 Oct; 121(1):215-7. PubMed ID: 959542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.