These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 644080)

  • 21. Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh, and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography.
    Gingold EL; Wu X; Barnes GT
    Radiology; 1995 Jun; 195(3):639-44. PubMed ID: 7753987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Increased radiation dose at mammography due to prolonged exposure, delayed processing, and increased film darkening.
    Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Chow S
    Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):387-91. PubMed ID: 1987598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Reduction of radiation dose during film mammography using a new film-screen combination. Inital report (author's transl)].
    Buck J; Barth V
    Rofo; 1978 Jul; 129(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 149720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [New intensifying screens in clinical radiology III: Screen-film combinations in mammography (author's transl)].
    Hagemann G; Knedel H; Weberling R
    Rofo; 1978 Aug; 129(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 151029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Film quality in film mammography. Article II: Signal/noise ratio of the recording system as a quantitative measure of quality. Final evaluation of recording systems (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M; Weskamp P
    Rofo; 1976 Nov; 125(5):461-71. PubMed ID: 137194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Measurement procedures for determining the switch-off dose in mammographic equipment].
    Wahl VH
    Rofo; 1987 Nov; 147(5):563-6. PubMed ID: 2825295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Patient doses from screen-film and full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening programme.
    Hauge IH; Pedersen K; Sanderud A; Hofvind S; Olerud HM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 21335333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Magnification mammography: a low-dose technique.
    Arnold BA; Eisenberg H; Bjarngard BE
    Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):743-9. PubMed ID: 441382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dose to tissue medium or water cavities as surrogate for the dose to cell nuclei at brachytherapy photon energies.
    Enger SA; Ahnesjö A; Verhaegen F; Beaulieu L
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 57(14):4489-500. PubMed ID: 22722477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mammography in the 1990s: the United States and Canada.
    Suleiman OH; Spelic DC; McCrohan JL; Symonds GR; Houn F
    Radiology; 1999 Feb; 210(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 10207413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Monochromatic x-rays in digital mammography.
    Lawaczeck R; Arkadiev V; Diekmann F; Krumrey M
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15597018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Normalized average glandular dose in magnification mammography.
    Liu B; Goodsitt M; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 7568836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Dose measurements in determining radiation exposure in mammography].
    Hoffmann R; Wolf R
    Rofo; 1984 Oct; 141(4):442-7. PubMed ID: 6436919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Letter: Variation of skin dose in mammography--a comparison of blue X-ray film (Medichrome) with conventional black and white (Kodak PE 4006).
    Stillman J; Palmer K
    Br J Radiol; 1975 Mar; 48(567):228-9. PubMed ID: 1125552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A survey of radiation dose and image quality in mammography: an ongoing program in Italy.
    Rimondi O; Gambaccini M; Candini GC; Indovina PL; Rosati A
    Health Phys; 1987 Apr; 52(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 3570786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Image information content and patient exposure.
    Motz JW; Danos M
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(1):8-22. PubMed ID: 634242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The status of film/screen mammography. Results of the BENT study.
    Jans RG; Butler PF; McCrohan JL; Thompson WE
    Radiology; 1979 Jul; 132(1):197-200. PubMed ID: 451199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the relationship between the x-ray pattern, photon energy and dose for a simple phantom.
    Lerch IA
    Phys Med Biol; 1972 Nov; 17(6):803-13. PubMed ID: 4637712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.