These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6443400)
21. Materials and techniques for achieving clinical excellence with indirect composite restorations. Brucia JJ Dent Clin North Am; 2001 Jan; 45(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 11210701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results. Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Designs for cast metal restorations. Kaiser DA; Becker CM; Malone WF Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):199-201. PubMed ID: 10388376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Systematics of cavity and stump preparations on the basis of structure-preserving principles]. Staegemann G Stomatol DDR; 1987 Jan; 37(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 3296328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. All-ceramic partial coverage premolar restorations. Cavity preparation design, reliability and fracture resistance after fatigue. Stappert CF; Guess PC; Gerds T; Strub JR Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 16296437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bonded restorations for the prevention and treatment of the cracked-tooth syndrome. Geurtsen W; GarcĂa-Godoy F Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):266-70. PubMed ID: 10850244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The influence of cavity preparation design on fracture strength and mode of fracture of laboratory-processed composite resin restorations. Fonseca RB; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Correr-Sobrinho L; Soares CJ J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 98(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 17936127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Dejak B; Mlotkowski A J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques in a treatment approach of one-surface cavities: design of a study. Rahimtoola NS; van Amerongen WE ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 9391710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Studies on the adaptability of the porcelain inlay to the cavity with bevel preparation]. Amano Y; Kobayashi K; Takei T; Fukui K; Kizima M; Koyama M; Nakagawa T; Katayama I Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1981; 10(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 6758885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Use of macro-models in teaching of tooth preparations. Shillingburg HT; Fisher DW J Dent Educ; 1973 Jan; 37(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 4509061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of cavity form and setting expansion of refractory dies on adaptability of fired ceramic inlays. Hayashi M; Miura M; Nishimura N; Takeshige F; Ebisu S Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 11203788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Achieving predictable results with posterior inlays and onlays. Howard NY Dent Today; 1996 May; 15(5):76, 78, 80-1. PubMed ID: 9567875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Rationale for the use and design of the MOD-inlay]. Kayser AF; Battistuzzi PG; Snoek PA Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1981 Sep; 88(9):282-5. PubMed ID: 6947146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]