These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 644363)

  • 1. Clindamycin and gentamicin in surgical infections.
    Edmondson HT; Moore WL; Rissing JP; Crockett JK
    South Med J; 1978 May; 71(5):533-7. PubMed ID: 644363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Third-generation cephalosporins for polymicrobial surgical sepsis.
    Stone HH; Strom PR; Fabian TC; Dunlop WE
    Arch Surg; 1983 Feb; 118(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 6295339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of cefotaxime versus gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of polymicrobial peritonitis.
    Stone HH; Geheber CE; Kolb LD; Strom PR
    Clin Ther; 1982; 5 Suppl A():1-9. PubMed ID: 6293712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective study comparing imipenem-cilastatin with clindamycin and gentamicin for the treatment of serious surgical infections.
    Hackford AW; Tally FP; Reinhold RB; Barza M; Gorbach SL
    Arch Surg; 1988 Mar; 123(3):322-6. PubMed ID: 3277587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective, randomized comparison of metronidazole and clindamycin, each with gentamicin, for the treatment of serious intra-abdominal infection.
    Surgery; 1983 Jan; 93(1 Pt 2):221-9. PubMed ID: 6849209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical comparison of cefotaxime versus the combination of gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of polymicrobial soft-tissue surgical sepsis.
    Strom PR; Geheber CE; Morris ES; Stone HH
    Clin Ther; 1982; 5 Suppl A():26-31. PubMed ID: 6293715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized trial of imipenem-cilastatin versus gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of polymicrobial infections.
    Danziger LH; Creger RJ; Shwed JA; Stellato TA; Hau T
    Pharmacotherapy; 1988; 8(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 3222164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of ciprofloxacin compared to gentamicin in the treatment of experimental intraabdominal infections in rats.
    Lahnborg G; Nord CE
    Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1989; 60():35-8. PubMed ID: 2756352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment of mixed bacterial infections with clindamycin and gentamicin.
    Fass RJ
    J Infect Dis; 1977 Mar; 135 Suppl():S74-9. PubMed ID: 403243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Piperacillin and a combination of clindamycin and gentamicin for the treatment of hospital and community acquired acute pelvic infections including pelvic abscess.
    Hemsell DL; Hemsell PG; Heard MC; Nobles BJ
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Sep; 165(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 3306994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective, randomized, comparative trials in the therapy for intraabdominal and female genital tract infections.
    Harding GK; Nicolle LE; Haase DA; Aoki FY; Stiver HG; Blanchard RJ; Kirkpatrick JR
    Rev Infect Dis; 1984; 6 Suppl 1():S283-92. PubMed ID: 6326244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Piperacillin and tazobactam versus clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of hospitalized women with pelvic infection. The Piperacillin/tazobactam Study Group.
    Sweet RL; Roy S; Faro S; O'Brien WF; Sanfilippo JS; Seidlin M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):280-6. PubMed ID: 8290195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multicenter study comparing intravenous meropenem with clindamycin plus gentamicin for the treatment of acute gynecologic and obstetric pelvic infections in hospitalized women.
    Hemsell DL; Martens MG; Faro S; Gall S; McGregor JA
    Clin Infect Dis; 1997 Feb; 24 Suppl 2():S222-30. PubMed ID: 9126697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ceftriaxone versus combined gentamicin and clindamycin for polymicrobial surgical sepsis.
    Stone HH; Mullins RJ; Strom PR; Bourneuf AA; Geheber CE
    Am J Surg; 1984 Oct; 148(4A):30-4. PubMed ID: 6091478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical comparison of cefotaxime versus the combination of gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of peritonitis and similar polymicrobial soft-tissue surgical sepsis.
    Stone HH; Geheber CE; Kolb LD; Dunlop WE
    Clin Ther; 1981; 4 Suppl A():67-80. PubMed ID: 6275999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clindamycin in infections of the female genital tract.
    Swenson RM; Michaelson TC; Daly MJ; Spalding EH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1974 Nov; 44(5):699-702. PubMed ID: 4418815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clindamycin and gentamicin for aerobic and anaerobic sepsis.
    Fass RJ; Ruiz DE; Gardner WG; Rotilie CA
    Arch Intern Med; 1977 Jan; 137(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 318824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Piperacillin versus clindamycin plus gentamicin for pelvic infections.
    Gilstrap LC; Maier RC; Gibbs RS; Connor KD; St Clair PJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Dec; 64(6):762-6. PubMed ID: 6504420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Results of the North American trial of piperacillin/tazobactam compared with clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Investigators of the Piperacillin/Tazobactam Intra-abdominal Infection Study Group.
    Eur J Surg Suppl; 1994; (573):61-6. PubMed ID: 7524798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of parenteral ticarcillin/clavulanate and clindamycin/gentamicin in serious intra-abdominal infections.
    Fink MP; Helsmoortel CM; Arous EJ; Doern GV; Moriarty KP; Fairchild PG; Townsend PL
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1989 Nov; 24 Suppl B():147-56. PubMed ID: 2691476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.