These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6444988)

  • 1. Overcoming Stroop interference: the effects of practice on distractor potency.
    Reisberg D; Baron J; Kemler DG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Feb; 6(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 6444988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Verbal coding and the elimination of Stroop interference in a matching task.
    Mascolo MF; Hirtle SC
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 2349976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proofreaders' decreased Stroop interference.
    Borzoni S; Hines T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Jun; 82(3 Pt 2):1104-6. PubMed ID: 8823877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Training and Stroop-like interference: evidence for a continuum of automaticity.
    MacLeod CM; Dunbar K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Jan; 14(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 2963892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Stroop-like effect in color-naming of color-word lexigrams by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodyte).
    Beran MJ; Washburn DA; Rumbaugh DM
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 17503696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of change in stimuli on the transfer of dimensional pretraining to the discrimination learning of kindergarten children.
    Cantor JH; Spiker CC
    Child Dev; 1978 Sep; 49(3):824-8. PubMed ID: 710193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
    Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: the progression of interference and facilitation.
    MacLeod CM
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 9584429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of auditory and visual linguistic distractors on target localization.
    Mayer AR; Kosson DS
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Apr; 18(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 15099147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task difficulty and visual similarity increase a distractor's effects on random shapes.
    Hines D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Feb; 46(1):235-48. PubMed ID: 643480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Constraints on the observation of partial match costs: implications for transfer-appropriate processing approaches to immediate priming.
    Leboe JP; Leboe LC; Milliken B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):634-48. PubMed ID: 20515194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanisms underlying reduction in Stroop interference with practice for young and old adults.
    Dulaney CL; Rogers WA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Mar; 20(2):470-84. PubMed ID: 8151280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implicit task sets in task switching?
    Dreisbach G; Goschke T; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17087579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Stroop effect in schizophrenic patients.
    Hepp HH; Maier S; Hermle L; Spitzer M
    Schizophr Res; 1996 Dec; 22(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 9000316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stroop interference and negative priming in patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Vitkovitch M; Bishop S; Dancey C; Richards A
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(9):1570-6. PubMed ID: 11985838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.
    Glaser MO; Glaser WR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Dec; 8(6):875-94. PubMed ID: 6218237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Color priming affects Stroop interference.
    McClain L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Apr; 56(2):643-51. PubMed ID: 6866673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella).
    D'Amato MR; Colombo M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Nov; 52(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 2584914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Odd-item search in pigeons: display size and transfer effects.
    Blough DS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Jan; 15(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 2926332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.