BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6444993)

  • 1. A further parallel between selective adaptation and contrast.
    Diehl RL; Lang M; Parker EM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Feb; 6(1):24-44. PubMed ID: 6444993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptation and contrast in the perception of voicing.
    Sawusch JR; Jusczyk P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Apr; 7(2):408-21. PubMed ID: 6453933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast effects on stop consonant identification.
    Diehl RL; Elman JL; McCusker SB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Nov; 4(4):599-609. PubMed ID: 722250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective anchoring and adaptation of phonetic and nonphonetic continua.
    Simon HJ; Studdert-Kennedy M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Nov; 64(5):1338-57. PubMed ID: 744835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic invariance and the perception of place of articulation: a selective adaptation study.
    Landahl KL; Blumstein SE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 May; 71(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 7085995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are selective adaptation and contrast effects really distinct?
    Diehl RL; Kluender KR; Parker EM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1985 Apr; 11(2):209-20. PubMed ID: 3159836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discrimination and Identification of a Third Formant Frequency Cue to Place of Articulation by Young Children and Adults.
    Richardson K; Sussman JE
    Lang Speech; 2017 Mar; 60(1):27-47. PubMed ID: 28326988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An auditory basis for the stimulus-length effect in the perception of stops and glides.
    Diehl RL; Walsh MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 May; 85(5):2154-64. PubMed ID: 2732389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the effect of onset asynchrony on auditory grouping in pitch matching and vowel identification.
    Hukin RW; Darwin CJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Feb; 57(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 7885817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A possible auditory basis for internal structure of phonetic categories.
    Miller JL; Connine CM; Schermer TM; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jun; 73(6):2124-33. PubMed ID: 6875098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective adaptation in speech perception using a compelling audiovisual adaptor.
    SaldaƱa HM; Rosenblum LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jun; 95(6):3658-61. PubMed ID: 8046153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels.
    Purcell DW; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2288-97. PubMed ID: 16642842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory processing in children's speech perception: results of selective adaptation and discrimination tasks.
    Sussman JE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 36(2):380-95. PubMed ID: 8487530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feature detection process in speech perception.
    Bryant JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Nov; 4(4):610-20. PubMed ID: 722251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Focused attention during selective adaptation along a place of articulation continuum.
    Sussman JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jan; 93(1):488-98. PubMed ID: 8423264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between adaptation and the percept and transformations of stop consonant voicing: effects of the number of repetitions and intensity of adaptors.
    Ohde RN; Sharf DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Jul; 66(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 489830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual-motor processing of phonetic features in speech.
    Gordon PC; Meyer DE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Apr; 10(2):153-78. PubMed ID: 6232338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phonetic perception: evidence for context-dependent and context-independent processing.
    Miller JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Mar; 69(3):822-31. PubMed ID: 7240563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anchoring effects in audiovisual speech perception.
    Shigeno S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2853-61. PubMed ID: 12083219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception.
    Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 May; 85(5):2088-113. PubMed ID: 2659638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.