These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6445937)
21. Intensity resolution and subjective magnitude in psychophysical scaling. Ward LM; Armstrong J; Golestani N Percept Psychophys; 1996 Jul; 58(5):793-801. PubMed ID: 8710456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. On loudness at threshold. Buus S; Müsch H; Florentine M J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):399-410. PubMed ID: 9670532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments? Schneider B; Parker S Percept Psychophys; 1990 Nov; 48(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 2247323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A limited-capacity response process in absolute identification. Mori S Percept Psychophys; 1989 Aug; 46(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 2762104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A cognitive influence on the loudness of tones that change continuously in level. Schlauch RS J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Aug; 92(2 Pt 1):758-65. PubMed ID: 1506529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Relationships between the variability of magnitude matching and the slope of magnitude level functions. Cefaratti LK; Zwislocki JJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jul; 96(1):126-33. PubMed ID: 8064015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Magnitude judgments of loudness change for discrete, dynamic, and hybrid stimuli. Pastore RE; Flint J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):886-907. PubMed ID: 21264709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A test of the equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis using cross-modality matching functions. Epstein M; Florentine M J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):907-13. PubMed ID: 16158646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A method for relating loudness-matching and intensity-discrimination data. Schlauch RS; Wier CC J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Mar; 30(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 3560891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Magnitude estimation and the "paradoxical" loudness of tinnitus. Penner MJ J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Sep; 29(3):407-12. PubMed ID: 3762105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A theory of criterion setting: an alternative to the attention band and response ratio hypotheses in magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching. Treisman M J Exp Psychol Gen; 1984 Sep; 113(3):443-63. PubMed ID: 6237172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of stimulus context on magnitude estimations and category ratings of perceived loudness--the spacing of intensity intervals. Davis ET; Allard T Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Feb; 72(1):227-42. PubMed ID: 2038517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Magnitude estimation and cross-modal matching of lingual vibrotactile and auditory sensation. Harris D; Fucci D; Petrosino L J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Sep; 32(3):698-702. PubMed ID: 2779214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Measurement of individual loudness functions by trisection of loudness ranges. Villchur E; Killion MC Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):693-703. PubMed ID: 18769270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Deriving the loudness exponent from categorical judgments. Norwich KH; Sagi E Percept Psychophys; 2002 Jul; 64(5):804-14. PubMed ID: 12201339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Loudness of brief tones measured by magnitude estimation and loudness matching. Epstein M; Florentine M J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):1943-5. PubMed ID: 16642806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Sequential dependencies in judgments of horizontal line lengths: application of attention band theory]. Mori S Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1986 Dec; 57(5):261-5. PubMed ID: 3573439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]