These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6447188)

  • 41. Echoic memory processes in good and poor readers.
    Sipe S; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Jul; 12(3):402-12. PubMed ID: 2942625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The separate but related origins of the recency effect and the modality effect in free recall.
    Beaman CP; Morton J
    Cognition; 2000 Dec; 77(3):B59-65. PubMed ID: 11018512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Recency and the modality effect in immediate ordered recall.
    Frick RW
    Can J Psychol; 1989 Dec; 43(4):494-511. PubMed ID: 2519915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Suffix interference in the recall of linguistically coherent speech.
    Balota DA; Cowan N; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 May; 16(3):446-56. PubMed ID: 2140403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Suffix effects and intrusion errors in young and elderly subjects.
    Greenhut-Wertz J; Manning SK
    Exp Aging Res; 1995; 21(2):173-90. PubMed ID: 7628510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Why do participants initiate free recall of short lists of words with the first list item? Toward a general episodic memory explanation.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1551-67. PubMed ID: 24933695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Presentation modality and mode of recall in verbal false memory.
    Kellogg RT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jul; 27(4):913-9. PubMed ID: 11486924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Extended recency effect extended: blocking, presentation mode, and retention interval.
    Glidden LM; Pawelski C; Mar H; Zigman W
    Am J Ment Defic; 1979 Jul; 84(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 484609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. On recency and echoic memory.
    Gardiner JM
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1983 Aug; 302(1110):267-82. PubMed ID: 6137846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A spacing account of negative recency in final free recall.
    Kuhn JR; Lohnas LJ; Kahana MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1180-1185. PubMed ID: 29648866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Visual distinctiveness can enhance recency effects.
    Bornstein BH; Neely CB; LeCompte DC
    Mem Cognit; 1995 May; 23(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 7791596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of recall procedures on the modality effect with numbers and enumerated stimuli.
    Gibbons JA; Velkey AK; Partin KT
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):84-104. PubMed ID: 18318410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Post-categorical processing and attenuation of the auditory suffix: evidence from both immediate and delayed suffixes.
    Miles C; Westley DP; Buller MJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1995 Sep; 89(3):261-82. PubMed ID: 7572269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Can the irrelevant speech effect turn into a stimulus suffix effect?
    Schlittmeier SJ; Hellbrück J; Klatte M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 18421641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Auditory recency in immediate memory.
    Surprenant AM; Pitt MA; Crowder RG
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1993 May; 46(2):193-223. PubMed ID: 8316636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Ineffectiveness of visual distinctiveness in enhancing immediate recall.
    McDowd J; Madigan S
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):371-7. PubMed ID: 1895947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Dissociation between recency and span: neuropsychological and experimental evidence.
    Della Sala S; Logie RH; Trivelli C; Cubelli R; Marchetti C
    Neuropsychology; 1998 Oct; 12(4):533-45. PubMed ID: 9805323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The role of auditory features in memory span for words.
    Drewnowski A; Murdock BB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 May; 6(3):319-32. PubMed ID: 7373250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Irrelevant speech, serial rehearsal, and temporal distinctiveness: a new approach to the irrelevant speech effect.
    LeCompte DC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Sep; 22(5):1154-65. PubMed ID: 8805820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparisons of memory for nonverbal auditory and visual sequential stimuli.
    McFarland DJ; Cacace AT
    Psychol Res; 1995; 57(2):80-7. PubMed ID: 7708900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.