These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The need for process research on psychophysical judgment: comments on "Ratio and subtractive processes in psychophysical judgment" by Veit. Levin IP J Exp Psychol Gen; 1978 Mar; 107(1):108-11. PubMed ID: 624915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ratio scale measurement of the perceived lengths of lines. Parker S; Schneider B; Kanow G J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 May; 104(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 1194865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceived numerosity, item arrangement, and expectancy. Ginsburg N Am J Psychol; 1978 Jun; 91(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 677346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Individual and group modelling of aesthetic judgment strategies. Jacobsen T Br J Psychol; 2004 Feb; 95(Pt 1):41-56. PubMed ID: 15005867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A perceptual process approach to selecting color scales for complex visualizations. Breslow LA; Trafton JG; Ratwani RM J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 19309214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A brief delay decreases perceived similarity and improves discrimination. King DL J Gen Psychol; 2002 Apr; 129(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 12153135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recovering stimuli from memory: a statistical method for linking discrimination and reproduction responses. Vevea JL Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):321-46. PubMed ID: 17067415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating stimuli from contrasting categories: truncation due to boundaries. Huttenlocher J; Hedges LV; Lourenco SF; Crawford LE; Corrigan B J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):502-19. PubMed ID: 17696696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the relations among different measures of visible and informational persistence. Loftus GR; Irwin DE Cogn Psychol; 1998 Mar; 35(2):135-99. PubMed ID: 9570898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inverted-U effects generalize to the judgment of subjective properties of faces. Mignault A; Marley AA; Chaudhuri A Percept Psychophys; 2008 Oct; 70(7):1274-88. PubMed ID: 18927009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Loci of contextual effects in judgment. Mellers BA; Birnbaum MH J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Aug; 8(4):582-601. PubMed ID: 6214609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients. Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct estimation considered within a comparative judgment framework. Smith J; Kaufman H; Baldasare J Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(3):343-58. PubMed ID: 6496808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ordinal judgments and summation of nonvisible sets of food items by two chimpanzees and a rhesus macaque. Beran MJ; Beran MM; Harris EH; Washburn DA J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jul; 31(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 16045389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Temporal interval discrimination thresholds depend on perceived synchrony for audio-visual stimulus pairs. van Eijk RL; Kohlrausch A; Juola JF; van de Par S J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1254-63. PubMed ID: 19653763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention. Casarotti M; Michielin M; Zorzi M; Umiltà C Cognition; 2007 Jan; 102(1):101-17. PubMed ID: 17046735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]