These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6447193)
21. A Müller-Lyer-type illusion of egocentric distance with 3D convex and concave objects. Gordon IE; Day RH; Dorwood F Scand J Psychol; 1993 Jun; 34(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 8322048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Gaze and the Eye Pupil Adjust to Imagined Size and Distance. Sulutvedt U; Mannix TK; Laeng B Cogn Sci; 2018 Nov; 42(8):3159-3176. PubMed ID: 30302788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Non-metric distance judgements are influenced by image projection geometry and field of view. Ruta N; Ganczarek J; Pietras K; Burleigh A; Pepperell R Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Dec; 76(12):2837-2853. PubMed ID: 36905339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessing the symbolic distance effect in mental images constructed from verbal descriptions: a study of individual differences in the mental comparison of distances. Denis M Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):197-210. PubMed ID: 17658445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The eye pupil adjusts to imaginary light. Laeng B; Sulutvedt U Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):188-97. PubMed ID: 24285432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. How does attention spread across objects oriented in depth? Reppa I; Fougnie D; Schmidt WC Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):912-25. PubMed ID: 20436189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance. Loftus A; Servos P; Goodale MA; Mendarozqueta N; Mon-Williams M Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 15164152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Vestibular information is necessary for maintaining metric properties of representational space: evidence from mental imagery. Péruch P; Lopez C; Redon-Zouiteni C; Escoffier G; Zeitoun A; Sanjuan M; Devèze A; Magnan J; Borel L Neuropsychologia; 2011 Sep; 49(11):3136-44. PubMed ID: 21820000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Differential effects of object orientation on imaginary object/viewer transformations. van Lier R Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Jun; 10(2):455-61. PubMed ID: 12921424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effects of motion and stereopsis on three-dimensional visualization. Hubona GS; Shirah GW; Fout DG Int J Hum Comput Stud; 1997 Nov; 47(5):609-27. PubMed ID: 11541533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A rat in the sewer: How mental imagery interacts with object recognition. Karimpur H; Hamburger K PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194227. PubMed ID: 29590161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]