BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6448790)

  • 1. [Image quality from direct radiological magnification (author's transl)].
    Franken T; Borcke E
    Rofo; 1980 Mar; 132(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 6448790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Reduction in radiation scatter during radiographic magnification techniques (author's transl)].
    Stargardt A; Angerstein W
    Rofo; 1975 Oct; 123(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 129398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Direct radiological magnification of thin objects compared with contact exposures and mammographic techniques (author's transl)].
    Franken T
    Rofo; 1982 Apr; 136(4):453-62. PubMed ID: 6212485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [New aspects concerning exposure factors during direct geometrical X-ray magnification (author's transl)].
    Freyschmidt J; Liebig J; Saure D; Fritsch R
    Rofo; 1978 Apr; 128(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 148413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of image quality obtained with optical and radiographic magnification techniques in fine-detail skeletal radiography: effect of object thickness.
    Doi K; Genant HK; Rossmann K
    Radiology; 1976 Jan; 118(1):189-95. PubMed ID: 1244657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [DIMA-magnification mammography. Phantom studies on image quality and radiation exposure of the patient].
    Hermann KP; Funke M; Brüggemeyer H; Sperner W; Gruhl T; Koch R
    Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 9376560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Direct digital magnification mammography with a large-surface detector made of amorphous silicon].
    Hermann KP; Hundertmark C; Funke M; von Brenndorff A; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 10370416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The factors influencing the relative exposure of the radiological picture with doubly amplifying film as opposed to singly amplifying film (author's transl)].
    Meiler J
    Rontgenblatter; 1974 Jul; 27(7):368-74. PubMed ID: 4417112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct radiographic magnification: evaluation of three microfocus x-ray tubes.
    De Smet AA; Fritz SL; Templeton AW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Jan; 138(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 6976689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Dosimetry and technical quality parameters of the Microfox G-10 medical direct radiographic magnification unit].
    Brüggemeyer H
    Radiologe; 1991 Sep; 31(9):418-23. PubMed ID: 1947060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct radiographic magnification with computed radiography.
    Nakano Y; Hiraoka T; Togashi K; Nishimura K; Itoh K; Fujisawa I; Sagoh T; Minami S; Itoh H; Torizuka K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Mar; 148(3):569-73. PubMed ID: 3492887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal magnification ratio of direct macroradiography in high magnification. Modulation transfer function study on system combined with intensifying screen-film and object.
    Ayakawa Y
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 1972 Feb; 34(3):227-40. PubMed ID: 5060780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The importance of rare-earth intensifying screen for picture magnification (author's transl)].
    Chudácek Z
    Cesk Radiol; 1980 Sep; 34(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 7418096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of two microfocus-tube imaging systems.
    Gould RG; Genant HK
    Radiology; 1981 Jan; 138(1):195-201. PubMed ID: 7455083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Direct radiographic magnification in dental radiology].
    Reuter I
    Radiologe; 1991 Sep; 31(9):443-6. PubMed ID: 1947065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The system concept of a microfocus x-ray system for clinical application].
    Gebureck P; Fredow G; Sperner W
    Radiologe; 1991 Sep; 31(9):407-12. PubMed ID: 1947058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The resolving capacity of systems for the reproduction of x-ray images].
    Blinov NN; Mazurov AI
    Med Tekh; 2000; (5):12-5. PubMed ID: 11076357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [X-ray phase imaging using a X-ray tube with a small focal spot -improvement of image quality in mammography-].
    Honda C; Ohara H; Ishisaka A; Shimada F; Endo T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12766293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.