These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6448790)

  • 41. Magnification radiography.
    Fodor J 3dP6 ; Malott JC
    Radiol Technol; 1987; 58(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 3550874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Microfocus roentgenography in medicine].
    Mazurov AI; Potrakhov NN
    Med Tekh; 2011; (5):30-3. PubMed ID: 22145401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Physical evaluation of prototype high-performance anti-scatter grids: potential for improved digital radiographic image quality.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):N37-42. PubMed ID: 19098352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A factorial experiment on image quality and radiation dose.
    Norrman E; Persliden J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):246-52. PubMed ID: 15933116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Contribution to the study of skeletal pathology by direct radiographic magnification with a radiogenic microfocus tube].
    Gattoni F; Pozzato C; Baldini U; Uslenghi C; Surace A
    Chir Organi Mov; 1984; 69(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 6518849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Amplitomography, a new development of amplifluorography (author's transl)].
    Ecarlat B; Rouleau Ph; Bertin Ph; Schmidt R; Gaubert P
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1976 Nov; 19(7):699-708. PubMed ID: 1008445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Sensitometric characteristics of medical roentgenographic and fluorographic films. Sensitivity of the amplifying screens combined with a film].
    Gurvich AM; Erofeeva ND; Katomina RV; Maslov LA
    Med Tekh; 1976; (2):17-22. PubMed ID: 1030760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Magnification radiography with Circlex 0.1 mm ultra-microfocus].
    Liu J
    Zhonghua Fang She Xue Za Zhi; 1989 Jun; 23(3):172-4. PubMed ID: 2582911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Radiation dose in renal magnification angiography compared with conventional angiography (author's transl)].
    Maly P; Knöös T
    Radiologe; 1978 May; 18(5):175-8. PubMed ID: 652984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Compton radiography. IV. Magnification Compton radiography (author's transl)].
    Okuyama S; Mishina H; Sera K; Shishido F; Rukuda H; Matsuzawa T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1978 Mar; 38(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 662584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Direct radiographic magnification of the hand: study of erosions in rheumatoid arthritis].
    Orzincolo C; Scutellari PN; Corcione S; Bonari LR; Campanati A
    Radiol Med; 1986 Apr; 72(4):218-21. PubMed ID: 3715073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Direct radiographic magnification in combination with digital radiography for bone imaging].
    Reuther G; Kronholz HL
    Radiologe; 1991 Sep; 31(9):424-9. PubMed ID: 1947061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Sialography with direct multiple image enlargement and the processing of the sialograms on an analog computer].
    Shargorodskiĭ AG; Prokopchuk NI; Forashchuk PF
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1994; 73(4):36-9. PubMed ID: 7732530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [New method of estimating x-ray magnification on angiographic volume determinations (author's transl)].
    Schulz W; Kaltenbach M
    Z Kardiol; 1978 Aug; 67(8):554-8. PubMed ID: 695807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Dose efficiency and the effects of resolution and noise on detail perceptibility in radiographic magnification.
    Wagner LK; Cohen G; Wong WH; Amtey SR
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 7207424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [The status of the direct magnifying x-ray technique in orthopedics].
    Wülker N; Siebert WE
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Mar; 3(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 8476947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Microfocus roentgenographic magnification in dentistry.
    Parmley RJ; Brodeur AE; Ferguson TL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 May; 59(5):530-4. PubMed ID: 3859813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Routine biplane cerebral angiography with stereoscopic magnification.
    Takahashi M; Ozawa Y
    Radiology; 1980 Jul; 136(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 7384485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Direct radiographic magnification: a contribution to the study of bone pathology].
    Gattoni F; Pozzato C; Baldini U; Mazzoni R; Nessi R; Uslenghi C
    Radiol Med; 1983; 69(7-8):513-8. PubMed ID: 6669739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [The clinical value of serial direct magnification cerebral angiography in the visibility of fine vessels of brain tumors (author's transl)[].
    Miyazaki Y
    No Shinkei Geka; 1977 Jun; 5(6):573-83. PubMed ID: 917227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.