These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6449536)

  • 1. Why search for target absence is so slow (and careful!): the more targets there are, the more likely you are to miss one.
    Krueger LE; Shapiro RG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Nov; 6(4):662-85. PubMed ID: 6449536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of practice on speed of mental rotation.
    Kail R; Park YS
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1990 Apr; 49(2):227-44. PubMed ID: 2332722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hemispheric differences in memory search.
    Madden DJ; Nebes RD
    Neuropsychologia; 1980; 18(6):665-73. PubMed ID: 7465026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set.
    Crist WB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):269-96. PubMed ID: 6457077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marijuana effects on the speed of memory retrieval in the letter-matching task.
    Block RI; Wittenborn JR
    Int J Addict; 1986 Feb; 21(2):281-5. PubMed ID: 3486840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Satisfaction in motion: Subsequent search misses are more likely in moving search displays.
    Stothart C; Clement A; Brockmole JR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Feb; 25(1):409-415. PubMed ID: 28484947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interaction between lateralization of memory and probe stimulus in the recognition of verbal and spatial visual stimuli.
    Berrini R; Capitani E; Della Sala S; Spinnler H
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(4):517-20. PubMed ID: 6483179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual memory as measured by classification and comparison tasks.
    Kroll NE; Ramskov CB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Jul; 10(3):395-420. PubMed ID: 6235308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The associated non-targets effect: evidence of nontarget processing at and beyond the level of letter recognition.
    Reynolds A; Miller J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):855-72. PubMed ID: 16608751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of perceptual quality and visual field of probe stimulus presentation on memory search for letters.
    Hellige JB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Nov; 6(4):639-51. PubMed ID: 6449535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Search for multiple targets: remember the targets, forget the search.
    Horowitz TS; Wolfe JM
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):272-85. PubMed ID: 11281102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of the number and form of stimuli on visual search in the pigeon.
    Blough DS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1979 Jul; 5(3):211-23. PubMed ID: 528887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of sequence and variety of irrelevant items on visual search.
    Marken R; Pettersen J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Aug; 49(1):315-8. PubMed ID: 503753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Features versus redundancy: comments on Massaro, Venezky, and Taylor's "Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings".
    Krueger LE
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Mar; 108(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 528896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Critical importance of exposure duration for affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized.
    Seamon JG; Marsh RL; Brody N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Jul; 10(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 6235312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Event-related potentials during memory search and selective attention to letter size and conjunctions of letter size and color.
    Wijers AA; Mulder G; Okita T; Mulder LJ
    Psychophysiology; 1989 Sep; 26(5):529-47. PubMed ID: 2616701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The familiarity effect for single-letter pairs.
    Ambler BA; Proctor JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 May; 2(2):222-34. PubMed ID: 830185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Memory scanning in a visual search task by schizophrenics and normals.
    Pharr DR; Connor JM
    J Clin Psychol; 1980 Jul; 36(3):625-31. PubMed ID: 7410557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Likability of targets and distractors in facial recognition.
    Mueller JH; Heesacker M; Ross MJ
    Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(2):235-47. PubMed ID: 6731653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Information processed from brief visual displays by learning-disabled boys.
    Blackwell SL; McIntyre CW; Murray ME
    Child Dev; 1983 Aug; 54(4):927-40. PubMed ID: 6617311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.