These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6451536)

  • 1. [Sodium or methyl glucamine salts as contrast media for urography (author's transl)].
    Taenzer V; Clauss W; Simon I
    Rofo; 1980 Jul; 133(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 6451536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate.
    Taenzer V; Heep H; Clauss W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Sodium salts or methylglucamine salts in contrast media for infusion pyelography? (author's transl)].
    Taenzer V; Albrecht A; Clauss W; Held I
    Radiologe; 1981 Jun; 21(6):288-90. PubMed ID: 7022552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Double-blind comparison of iodamide and diatrizoate for excretory urography.
    Rosenfield AT; Putman CE; Ulreich S; Koss N
    Yale J Biol Med; 1977; 50(6):631-6. PubMed ID: 345632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pediatric urography: comparison of metrizamide and methylglucamine diatrizoate.
    Robey G; Reilly BJ; Carusi PA; Nguyen KB
    Radiology; 1984 Jan; 150(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 6359266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of iohexol in pediatric urography: a comparative study with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Bani E; Federighi F; Ghio R; Marchitiello M; Galigani P; Palla R
    Int J Pediatr Nephrol; 1985; 6(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 4093245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Clinical evaluation of cardiovascular reactions to renal contrast media using an impedance method (author's transl)].
    Brutschin P; Vock P; Fuchs WA
    Rofo; 1976 Oct; 125(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 136404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of lopamidol and diatrizoate in excretory urography: a double-blind clinical study.
    Cochran ST; Ballard JW; Katzberg RW; Barbaric ZL; Spataro R; Iwamoto K; Lee JJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Sep; 151(3):523-7. PubMed ID: 3044040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Investigation on the renal clearance of metylglucamine diatrizoate and of sodium and metylglucamine diatrizoate (author's transl)].
    Michelassi PL; Rindi P; Pilone N; Simonetti F
    Radiol Med; 1979 Sep; 65(9):611-4. PubMed ID: 554248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of pain and heat sensation of contrast media in aortofemoral angiography: meglumine-amidotrizoate (Angiografin) mixed with lidocaine versus sodium-meglumine-ioxaglate (Hexabrix).
    Heystraten FM; van den Berg FG; Mulderije ED
    Diagn Imaging; 1983; 52(2-3):141-4. PubMed ID: 6851813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of the contrast medium meglumine amidotrizoate on renal extraction of para-amino hippurate after injection into the renal vein.
    Tidgren B
    Clin Physiol; 1985 Jun; 5(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 4006410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Double-blind comparison of meglumine iodamide and Renografin-60 for excretory urography.
    Gerzof SG; Robbins AH; Unger G; Zaki A; Wickis EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 Feb; 128(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 401604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Fatal contrast medium reaction in untreated Waldenström's disease (author's transl)].
    Burchardt P; Flenker H; Schoop HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1981 Sep; 106(38):1223-5. PubMed ID: 6806058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Product selection criteria for intravascular ionic contrast media.
    Swanson DP; Dick TJ; Simms SM; Thrall JH
    Clin Pharm; 1985; 4(5):527-38. PubMed ID: 3902331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison between ionic and non ionic contrast media in fast injection nephro-urography (author's transl)].
    Dalla Palma L; Rossi M; Stacul F; Agostini R
    Radiol Med; 1981; 67(1-2):55-60. PubMed ID: 7268075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Prevention of iodinated contrast media nephrotoxicity in patients with renal insufficiency].
    Teruel JL; Llorente MT; Herrero JA; Liaño F; Orte L; Matesanz R; Ortuño J
    Med Clin (Barc); 1988 Sep; 91(8):281-2. PubMed ID: 3210821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Excretory urography--current indications of the status of a conventional diagnostic method. Status of nonionic and ionic contrast media].
    Porst H; Mayer R
    Fortschr Med; 1985 Aug; 103(30):755-8. PubMed ID: 4043912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A new contrast medium (author's transl)].
    Wehling H
    Radiologe; 1975 Sep; 15(9):373-6. PubMed ID: 1188093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrograde urography with a new antiseptic contrast contrast material. An experimental study.
    Werbin N; Orda R; Tulpan G; Baratz M; Wiznitzer T
    Urol Int; 1981; 36(5):322-4. PubMed ID: 7324296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The adverse effects of the water-soluble iodinated contrast media used in excretory urography in the canine species].
    Hita Rosino E; Agut Giménez A; Sánchez-Valverde García MA
    Actas Urol Esp; 1999 May; 23(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 10427811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.