These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6452372)

  • 1. [Quality control during mammography-II (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M
    Rofo; 1981 Mar; 134(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 6452372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Suggestions for standardisation of dose measurements and dose recording during mammography (author's transl)].
    Säbel M
    Rofo; 1981 Mar; 134(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 6452373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
    Friedrich MA
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reference levels for image quality in mammography.
    Zdesar U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):170-2. PubMed ID: 18375465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The procedures and results of a quality control program in mammography carried out on a regional basis].
    Milano F; Rosselli Del Turco M; Maggi E; Certo N; Morrone D; Lazzeri B
    Radiol Med; 1996 Mar; 91(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 8628928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Image quality in film and xero-mammography. I. Rendering of low contrast values (author's transl)].
    Säbel M; Paterok EM; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F
    Rofo; 1977 Jun; 126(6):529-36. PubMed ID: 142714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria.
    Hemdal B; Andersson I; Grahn A; Håkansson M; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Båth M; Börjesson S; Medin J; Tingberg A; Månsson LG; Mattsson S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [X-ray examination of the breast (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M
    Rontgenblatter; 1981 Apr; 34(4):151-60. PubMed ID: 7015468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria.
    Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Dimov A; Lichev A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Reduction of radiation dose during film mammography using a new film-screen combination. Inital report (author's transl)].
    Buck J; Barth V
    Rofo; 1978 Jul; 129(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 149720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quality assurance of mammography in the province of Trent].
    Valentini A; Nassivera E; Voltolini A; Volani M; Gottardi S
    Radiol Med; 1993 Sep; 86(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 8210532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography].
    Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2000 Nov; 172(11):940-5. PubMed ID: 11142129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technological improvements in mammography over the past 20 years.
    Haus AG
    Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 8302212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Dose requirement and definition of the image with new types of mammographic systems (author's transl)].
    Frost D; Krause RA
    Strahlentherapie; 1980 Nov; 156(11):770-5. PubMed ID: 7434387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Quality control of mammography: potential use of a new device for testing the image quality and the dose].
    Di Maggio C; Gennaro G; Gambaccini M; Cattozzo S
    Radiol Med; 1996 Sep; 92(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 8975313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Value of increasing film processing time to reduce radiation dose during mammography.
    Skubic SE; Yagan R; Oravec D; Shah Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Dec; 155(6):1189-93. PubMed ID: 2122664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
    Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Use of the ROC method in problems of image quality and quality control in mammography].
    Wurm J; Säbel M; Weishaar J
    Rofo; 1982 Aug; 137(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 6215307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.