These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6452373)

  • 1. [Suggestions for standardisation of dose measurements and dose recording during mammography (author's transl)].
    Säbel M
    Rofo; 1981 Mar; 134(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 6452373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quality control during mammography-II (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M
    Rofo; 1981 Mar; 134(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 6452372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Real-time estimation system for mean glandular dose in mammography.
    Matsumoto M; Inoue S; Honda I; Yamamoto S; Ueguchi T; Ogata Y; Johkoh T
    Radiat Med; 2003; 21(6):280-4. PubMed ID: 14743903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Dose measurements during mammography using a grid (author's transl)].
    Nüsslin F
    Rofo; 1979 Mar; 130(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 155581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Use of the ROC method in problems of image quality and quality control in mammography].
    Wurm J; Säbel M; Weishaar J
    Rofo; 1982 Aug; 137(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 6215307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Reduction of radiation dose during film mammography using a new film-screen combination. Inital report (author's transl)].
    Buck J; Barth V
    Rofo; 1978 Jul; 129(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 149720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
    Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reference levels for image quality in mammography.
    Zdesar U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):170-2. PubMed ID: 18375465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Quality assurance of mammography in the province of Trent].
    Valentini A; Nassivera E; Voltolini A; Volani M; Gottardi S
    Radiol Med; 1993 Sep; 86(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 8210532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Measurement procedures for determining the switch-off dose in mammographic equipment].
    Wahl VH
    Rofo; 1987 Nov; 147(5):563-6. PubMed ID: 2825295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A comparison of the radiation dose from film and xeroradiography (author's transl)].
    Evers R; Römer M
    Rofo; 1975 Jul; 123(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 130303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [X-ray examination of the breast (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M
    Rontgenblatter; 1981 Apr; 34(4):151-60. PubMed ID: 7015468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [DIMA-magnification mammography. Phantom studies on image quality and radiation exposure of the patient].
    Hermann KP; Funke M; Brüggemeyer H; Sperner W; Gruhl T; Koch R
    Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 9376560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The procedures and results of a quality control program in mammography carried out on a regional basis].
    Milano F; Rosselli Del Turco M; Maggi E; Certo N; Morrone D; Lazzeri B
    Radiol Med; 1996 Mar; 91(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 8628928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The Dosage and Quality of Imaging program and quality assurance in mammography].
    Rimondi O; Gambaccini M; Marziani M; Candini GC; Indovina PL; Toti A; De Guglielmo E; Calicchia A
    Radiol Med; 1991; 81(1-2):69-72. PubMed ID: 2006340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography].
    Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2000 Nov; 172(11):940-5. PubMed ID: 11142129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Mammography -a guidance level and the present situation of mammographic dose-].
    Terada H
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 12766282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Film quality in film mammography. Article II: Signal/noise ratio of the recording system as a quantitative measure of quality. Final evaluation of recording systems (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M; Weskamp P
    Rofo; 1976 Nov; 125(5):461-71. PubMed ID: 137194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.