76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 645278)
1. [Value of suspicious and doubtful cytological findings in gynecologic serial examinations].
Goldmann C; Herold E; Neuser D; Sielaff E
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1978; 100(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 645278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The value of cytological screening for neoplasms in young women].
Kubista E; Kucera H; Ulm R
Osterr Z Onkol; 1976; 3(4):103-6. PubMed ID: 1037017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Results of cytological routine checks (author's transl)].
Scholz A
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1979; 101(15):958-61. PubMed ID: 532421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Diagnostic verification of Group III and III D cytological tests with special reference to follow-up].
Schlegel H; Kühndel K
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1983; 105(24):1585-96. PubMed ID: 6666444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clarification of cytologically doubtful findings of the cervix by DNA-single-cell-fluorescence-cytophotometry].
Hilgarth M
Fortschr Med; 1976 Sep; 94(27):1485-7. PubMed ID: 786837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Cytological and histological parallels in atypical colposcopic findings].
Raĭcheva I; Lazarova L; Zlatkov V; Maĭnkhard K; Raĭcheva S; Zamfirova K
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1998; 37(2):23-5. PubMed ID: 9859530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Incidence, causes and follow-up of doubtful smear findings (Papanicolaou group III)].
Hofmann R; Barten G; Rohde E; Beust M; Hamann H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1989; 111(23):1549-54. PubMed ID: 2624007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Follow up after an abnormal pap smear: time interval acceptable, nature of follow up leaves room for improvement].
Geertsen M; Bais AG; Beerman H; Helmerhorst TJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Dec; 147(49):2430-4. PubMed ID: 14694554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Assessment of the use of Pap test in a sample of pregnant women].
Dindelli M; Parazzini F; Rabaiotti E; Liati P; Ferrari A
Minerva Ginecol; 1990; 42(7-8):305-8. PubMed ID: 2293073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Study on the maintenance of the accuracy of cytological diagnosis in the mass screening of uterine cervical cancer].
Takahashi K; Yamane Y; Fukuda S; Kijima S; Moriyama M; Kitao M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 May; 38(5):633-7. PubMed ID: 3722946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cervix smears with mild atypia classified as Pap-class IIIA: results of a changed policy].
Doornewaard H; Woudt JM; Sie-Go DM; Kooijman CD
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1991 Sep; 135(36):1642-5. PubMed ID: 1922503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cytological finding in the pre- and early stages of cervix carcinoma--a contribution to the evaluation of Papanicolau III].
Bader G; Büttner HH; Neumann HG; Rhode E; Beust M
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1977; 99(11):657-60. PubMed ID: 899349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of dubious and positive cervical cytological examinations for neoplasms and correlated histological examinations made 1970-1980 at the Savona Hospital].
Ballerini D; De Pirro W; Nadin C
Pathologica; 1981; 73(1027):793-803. PubMed ID: 7043381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Cytologic follow-up examination of patients with a suspicious Papanicoaou type 3D smear (author's transl)].
Rummel HH; Fick R; Heberling D; Schubert D
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1977 Jun; 37(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 885324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Less pap-2 results ('minor abnormalities') in the population screening for cervical cancer since the introduction of new guidelines in 1996].
Bos AB; van Ballegooijen M; van den Akker-van Marle ME; Habbema JD
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Aug; 146(34):1586-90. PubMed ID: 12224483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. PAP smear after radiation therapy for cervical carcinoma.
Rintala MA; Rantanen VT; Salmi TA; Klemi PJ; Grénman SE
Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(5B):3747-50. PubMed ID: 9427773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Significance of atypia in conventional Papanicolaou smears and liquid-based cytology: a follow-up study.
Schledermann D; Ejersbo D; Hoelund B
Cytopathology; 2004 Jun; 15(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 15165271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the cervical cytology test using the PAPNET method and conventional microscopy.
Weissbrod D; Torres M; Rodríguez A; Ureña I; Estrada J; Reyes ME; Carreto AJ
Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 9041745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
