BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6453922)

  • 1. The effect of inattention on form perception.
    Rock I; Gutman D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Apr; 7(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 6453922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective attention in vision: recognition memory for superimposed line drawings.
    Goldstein EB; Fink SI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Oct; 7(5):954-67. PubMed ID: 6457115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lingering effects of inattention on the recognition of novel forms.
    Becker DV
    Memory; 2009 Aug; 17(6):687-94. PubMed ID: 19585347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inattention and the perception of visual features.
    Wright RD; Katz AN; Hughes EA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1993 Aug; 83(3):225-35. PubMed ID: 8213214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Event-related potentials during memory search and selective attention to letter size and conjunctions of letter size and color.
    Wijers AA; Mulder G; Okita T; Mulder LJ
    Psychophysiology; 1989 Sep; 26(5):529-47. PubMed ID: 2616701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regression to egocentrically determined description of form under conditions of inattention.
    Rock I; Nijhawan R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 May; 15(2):259-72. PubMed ID: 2525599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The structure of memory: evidence concerning the recall of surface and background color of shapes.
    Wilton RN
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1989 Aug; 41(3):579-98. PubMed ID: 2798923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Priming effect as related to difficulty in selection for overlapping stimuli manipulated by the relative line thickness of attended and unattended figures.
    Kobari H
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Jun; 86(3 Pt 2):1219-30. PubMed ID: 9700798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing of form: further evidence for the necessity of attention.
    Butler L; McKelvie SJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Aug; 61(1):215-21. PubMed ID: 4047881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of selective attention on perceptual filling-in.
    De Weerd P; Smith E; Greenberg P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Mar; 18(3):335-47. PubMed ID: 16513000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brain potentials during selective attention, memory search, and mental rotation.
    Wijers AA; Otten LJ; Feenstra S; Mulder G; Mulder LJ
    Psychophysiology; 1989 Jul; 26(4):452-67. PubMed ID: 2798695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Context influence on the perception of figures as conditional upon perceptual organization strategies.
    Stins JF; van Leeuwen C
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jan; 53(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 8433904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dissociation between features and feature relations in infant memory: effects of memory load.
    Bhatt RS; Rovee-Collier C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Oct; 67(1):69-89. PubMed ID: 9344488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Form characteristics of category-retrieval relationships in children and adults.
    Lange G; Griffith SB; Nida RE
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Jan; 117(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 2313279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ambiguous figures: role of context and critical features.
    Goolkasian P
    J Gen Psychol; 1987 Jul; 114(3):217-28. PubMed ID: 3612106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selective attention to facial identity and facial emotion.
    Etcoff NL
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(3):281-95. PubMed ID: 6462422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cat's response to stimulus difference as attention focus and cue.
    Robinson JS; Murray DM; Voneida TJ
    Perception; 1978; 7(4):437-47. PubMed ID: 704274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What ever happened to the norms for the Matching Familiar Figures Test?
    Walker NW
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Dec; 63(3):1235-42. PubMed ID: 3808898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conjunction search revisited.
    Treisman A; Sato S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):459-78. PubMed ID: 2144564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Subjective landmarks in perception and memory for spatial location.
    Bryant DJ; Subbiah I
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1994 Mar; 48(1):119-39. PubMed ID: 8038766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.