These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6454438)

  • 1. Tubal patency testing in a programme of artificial insemination with donor semen.
    Edmonds DK; Matthews CD; Cox LW
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Jul; 88(7):761-4. PubMed ID: 6454438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intrauterine insemination results are not affected if Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography is used as the sole test of tubal patency.
    Hamilton J; Latarche E; Gillott C; Lower A; Grudzinskas JG
    Fertil Steril; 2003 Jul; 80(1):165-71. PubMed ID: 12849819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abnormal findings on hysterosalpingography: effects on fecundity in a donor insemination program using frozen semen.
    Stovall DW; Christman GM; Hammond MG; Talbert LM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):249-52. PubMed ID: 1635739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The validity of air and saline hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography in tubal patency investigation before insemination treatment.
    Ahinko-Hakamaa K; Huhtala H; Tinkanen H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 May; 132(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 16952418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The value of hysterosalpingography prior to donor artificial insemination.
    Nash D; Haning RV; Shapiro SS
    Fertil Steril; 1979 Apr; 31(4):378-80. PubMed ID: 428579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificial insemination with donor semen. Review of 252 patients.
    Kovacs GT; Lording DW
    Med J Aust; 1980 Nov; 2(11):609-12. PubMed ID: 7464618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative study on assessment of tubal patency among tubal insufflation, hydrotubation, hysterosalpingography and chromotubation under laparoscopy].
    Zuo W; Wang P
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1996 Jan; 31(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 8758816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative trial of tubal insufflation, hysterosalpingography, and laparoscopy with dye hydrotubation for assessment of tubal patency. World Health Organization.
    Fertil Steril; 1986 Dec; 46(6):1101-7. PubMed ID: 2946609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pregnancy rates with fresh versus computer-controlled cryopreserved semen for artificial insemination by donor in a private practice setting.
    DiMarzo SJ; Huang J; Kennedy JF; Villanueva B; Hebert SA; Young PE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jun; 162(6):1483-8; discussion 1488-90. PubMed ID: 2360580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Artificial insemination with frozen stored donor semen.
    Bromwich P; Kilpatrick M; Newton JR
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1978 Sep; 85(9):641-4. PubMed ID: 698145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The assessment of endometrial pathology and tubal patency: a comparison between the use of ultrasonography and X-ray hysterosalpingography for the investigation of infertility patients.
    Strandell A; Bourne T; Bergh C; Granberg S; Asztely M; Thorburn J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 14(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 10550881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tests of tubal patency: comparison of laparoscopy and hysterosalpingography.
    Lapido OA
    Br Med J; 1976 Nov; 2(6047):1297-8. PubMed ID: 137026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tubal surgery and subsequent artificial insemination by donor.
    Lauritsen JG; Vangsted P; Pagel JD; Starup J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1983; 62(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 6637405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transvaginal sonographic tubal patency testing using air and saline solution as contrast media in a routine infertility clinic setting.
    Volpi E; Zuccaro G; Patriarca A; Rustichelli S; Sismondi P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jan; 7(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 8932631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Triple evaluation of tubal patency.
    Portuondo JA; Echanojauregui AD; Peña Irala J; Calonge J
    Int J Fertil; 1980; 25(4):307-10. PubMed ID: 6114055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pregnancies after ultrasound-guided fallopian insemination with cryostored donor semen.
    Jansen RP; Anderson JC; Radonic I; Smit J; Sutherland PD
    Fertil Steril; 1988 May; 49(5):920-2. PubMed ID: 3282931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tubal patency: hysterosalpingography compared with laparoscopy.
    Servy EJ; Tzingounis VA
    South Med J; 1978 Dec; 71(12):1511-2. PubMed ID: 152979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Insemination with fresh donor semen.
    Meeks GR; McDonald J; Gookin K; Bates GW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Oct; 68(4):527-30. PubMed ID: 3748503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. National survey of current practice in assessing tubal patency in the UK.
    Vyjayanthi S; Kingsland CR; Dunham R; Balen AH
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2004 Dec; 7(4):267-70. PubMed ID: 15621891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tubal patency after local methotrexate injection for tubal pregnancy.
    Pansky M; Bukovsky I; Golan A; Weinraub Z; Schneider D; Langer R; Arieli S; Caspi E
    Lancet; 1989 Oct; 2(8669):967-8. PubMed ID: 2571874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.