These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6455885)
1. [Scanning electron microscope examinations of the surfaces of implants prior and subsequent to implantation (author's transl)]. Köhler S; Köhler S; Retemeyer K; Menninger H Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1981; 69(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 6455885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparative scanning electron microscopical investigation of the bond between bone and different alloplastic implant materials (author's transl)]. Köhler S; Retemeyer K; Joecks L; Menniger H; Berger G Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1980; 68(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 6450495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Investigations of the interfaces between implant and bone by means of an electron probe x-ray microanalysis apparatus (author's transl)]. Köhler S; Retemeyer K; Berger G; Böcker G; Wilde M Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1981; 69(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 6455882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [SEM findings in the implant interface after endosseous implantation of bio-sintered ceramics]. Schubert R; Schubert U; Menniger H Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1986; 74(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 2939661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment. Fawzy AS; Amer MA Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new advanced surface modification technique--titanium oxide ceramic surface implants: the background and long-term results. Szabó G; Kovács L; Vargha K; Barabás J; Németh Z J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1999; 9(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 10847966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy. Weinlaender M; Beumer J; Kenney EB; Lekovic V; Holmes R; Moy PK; Plenk H Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations. Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 9857595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metal release from titanium fixtures during placement in the mandible: an experimental study. Schliephake H; Reiss G; Urban R; Neukam FW; Guckel S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(5):502-11. PubMed ID: 8112789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The choice of alloplastic materials for oral implants: does it really matter? Glantz PO Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 9922732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Jarmar T; Palmquist A; Brånemark R; Hermansson L; Engqvist H; Thomsen P Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bioglass implant materials. Clark A J Oral Implantol; 1986; 12(3):477-84. PubMed ID: 3470528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparative studies by scanning electron microscopy of the surface structure of polycarbonate film bases and PMMA denture bases (author's transl)]. Schubert R; Briese D Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1980; 68(7):697-705. PubMed ID: 6452003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Surface chemistry effects of topographic modification of titanium dental implant surfaces: 2. In vitro experiments. Cassinelli C; Morra M; Bruzzone G; Carpi A; Di Santi G; Giardino R; Fini M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 12608668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Composite morphology of the bone and associated support-tissue interfaces to osseointegrated dental implants: TEM and HVEM analyses. Steflik DE; Corpe RS; Lake FT; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Hanes PJ; Buttle K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 9274073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone surfaces adjacent to a subperiosteal implant: a SEM study. Russell TE; Kapur SP J Oral Implantol; 1977; 7(3):415-39. PubMed ID: 275513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Titanium and osteointegration--preliminary study. Pimenta J; Rohrer M; Castro F; Peres F J Okla Dent Assoc; 1995; 86(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 9526227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Continuous corrosion of endodontic implants of tantalum and titanium--a scanning electron microscopical study]. Ruzicka F Osterr Z Stomatol; 1980 Oct; 77(10):355-62. PubMed ID: 6937857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Scanning electron microscopy studies of endosseous implant surfaces following one year of implantation in animal experiment]. Jacobs HG; Kirsch T Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1976; 21():151-4. PubMed ID: 1068032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]