These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6457077)

  • 1. Matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set.
    Crist WB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):269-96. PubMed ID: 6457077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Context is important but it does not explain everything: a comment on "Matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set" by Crist.
    Nickerson RS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 6457078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tactual and name matching by blind children.
    Millar S
    Br J Psychol; 1977 Aug; 68(3):377-87. PubMed ID: 890225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differentiation of holistic processing in the time course of letter recognition.
    Lachmann T; van Leeuwen C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 18586218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Representation of letters when mislocation errors occur.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Apr; 117(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 2366047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of practice on speed of mental rotation.
    Kail R; Park YS
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1990 Apr; 49(2):227-44. PubMed ID: 2332722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of geometric models to letter recognition: distance and density.
    Appelman IB; Mayzner MS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1982 Mar; 111(1):60-100. PubMed ID: 6460835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tests of a two-stage model of visual matching.
    Rosen K; Hershenson M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Apr; 56(2):343-54. PubMed ID: 6866645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hemisphere-specific resource demands of task expectancies.
    Lamberts K; d'Ydewalle G
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1990 Feb; 42(1):87-104. PubMed ID: 2326492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of familiarity of Multielement matching.
    Regan JE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Dec; 7(6):1273-82. PubMed ID: 6458651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marijuana effects on the speed of memory retrieval in the letter-matching task.
    Block RI; Wittenborn JR
    Int J Addict; 1986 Feb; 21(2):281-5. PubMed ID: 3486840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The familiarity effect for single-letter pairs.
    Ambler BA; Proctor JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 May; 2(2):222-34. PubMed ID: 830185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus encoding by mentally retarded and nonretarded adults.
    Caruso DR; Detterman DK
    Am J Ment Defic; 1983 May; 87(6):649-55. PubMed ID: 6869423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Familiarity effects in visual comparison tasks and their implications for studying human intelligence.
    Tetewsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 May; 18(3):577-94. PubMed ID: 1534357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of category identity on letter matching: conceptual penetration of visual processing or response competition?
    Chen J; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 May; 74(4):716-29. PubMed ID: 22231606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual knowledge underlying letter perception: font-specific, schematic tuning.
    Sanocki T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 May; 13(2):267-78. PubMed ID: 2953856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual memory as measured by classification and comparison tasks.
    Kroll NE; Ramskov CB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Jul; 10(3):395-420. PubMed ID: 6235308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceived symmetry and visual matching.
    Hershenson M; Ryder J
    Am J Psychol; 1982; 95(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 7168458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognition time for letters and nonletters: effects of serial position, array size, and processing order.
    Mason M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Oct; 8(5):724-38. PubMed ID: 6218232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual persistence and code selection in short-term memory for letters.
    Kirsner K; Sang DL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 May; 5(2):260-76. PubMed ID: 528938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.