These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6457077)
21. Testing the role of vertical symmetry in letter matching. Egeth HE; Brownell HH; Geoffrion LD J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Aug; 2(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 993747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Further analysis of the Crist data on matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set. Pike R; Jackson K J Exp Psychol Gen; 1983 Sep; 112(3):347-56. PubMed ID: 6225827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Letter matching within and between the disconnected hemispheres. Eviatar Z; Zaidel E Brain Cogn; 1994 May; 25(1):128-37. PubMed ID: 8043263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The recovery of identity and relative position from visual input: further evidence for the independence of processing of what and where. Quinlan PT Percept Psychophys; 1998 Feb; 60(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 9529914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Visual memory for pictorial stimuli in a serial choice reaction-time task. Marshall E; Walker P Br J Psychol; 1987 May; 78 ( Pt 2)():213-31. PubMed ID: 3594091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Putting properties of objects in context: reply to Nickerson. Crist WB J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):303-5. PubMed ID: 6457079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of blurring and stimulus size on the lateralized processing of nonverbal stimuli. Michimata C; Hellige JB Neuropsychologia; 1987; 25(2):397-407. PubMed ID: 3601044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The bilateral field advantage on a letter-matching task. Ludwig TE; Jeeves MA; Norman WD; DeWitt R Cortex; 1993 Dec; 29(4):691-713. PubMed ID: 8124944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Is visual image segmentation a bottom-up or an interactive process? Vecera SP; Farah MJ Percept Psychophys; 1997 Nov; 59(8):1280-96. PubMed ID: 9401461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Differential effects of concurrent letters on visual field differences in letter recognition. Hatta T Int J Neurosci; 1982 Sep; 17(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7166476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Left visual field superiority in a letter-naming task for both left- and right-handers. Bashore TR; Nydegger RV; Miller H Cortex; 1982 Jul; 18(2):245-55. PubMed ID: 7128173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings. Massaro DW; Venezky RL; Taylor GA J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Mar; 108(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 528895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Global shape cannot be attended without object identification. Boucart M; Humphreys GW J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Aug; 18(3):785-806. PubMed ID: 1500876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An unreported size illusion. Carrasco M; Sekuler EB Perception; 1993; 22(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 8316518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Negative priming in same-different matching: further evidence for a central locus of inhibition. Neill WT; Lissner LS; Beck JL Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):398-400. PubMed ID: 2243764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Effects of structural and naming factors of letters upon the recognition of tachistoscopic letters (author's transl)]. Kitamori A Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1981 Apr; 52(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 7300053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Information processing in the cerebral hemispheres: selective hemispheric activation and capacity limitations. Hellige JB; Cox PJ; Litvac L J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Jun; 108(2):251-79. PubMed ID: 528905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Why is word recognition impaired by disorientation while the identification of single letters is not? Koriat A; Norman J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):153-63. PubMed ID: 2522525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]